Friday 18/9: I started this lesson by going through the syllabus for Paper 1, Paper 2 and Paper 3. When we looked at Paper 3 "Europe and the Middle East" the syllabus informed us about 12 possible topics. In the exam you will be given two questions/options on each one of the 12 topics. These are the topics we will focus on;
2. Unification and consolidation of Germany 1815-90
5. Imperial Russia, revolutions, emergence of Soviet State 1853-1924
6. European diplomacy and the First World War 1870-1923
8. Interwar years: conflict and cooperation 1919-39
9. The Soviet Union and Eastern Europe 1924-2000 (as much as possible)
10. The Second World War and post-war Western Europe 1939-2000 (as much as possible)
Here is a link to the new syllasbus where you can find more information about each topic;
Since we run one course together with SL it's important to not let the HL topic confuse us. Next Friday (25/9) we will start with Prussia 1800-1815. Your homework is to find out as much as possiblke about Prussia during this period - geographically, socially, economically and politically...
Friday 25/9: I started with "Otto der Grosse" - Otto the Great. In 962 Otto the Great received the title "Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire" by Pope John XII in Rome. This was the "First Reich". The Royal family of Prussia was the Hohenzollern - a German dynasty that originated from Count Buchard of Zollern (a castle in Baden-Wurttemberg). The family then advanced to be the rulers of Nurnberg (1200's), then rulers of Brandenburg. This district was awarded to the Hohenzollern family for military services done to the Holy Roman Emperor in 1415. One of the later Hohenzollerns also became the "High Master of the German Orden" in East Prussia. He made this part inheritable to the Hohenzollern family. During the 17th century the Hohenzollerns obtained some land along the Rhine... In 1701 the elector of Brandenburg was crowned King "FREDERICK I of PRUSSIA". Here are two links. One to the older history of Prussia: OLD HISTORY OF PRUSSIA and one link to the history of Prussia between 1701-1815: PRUSSIA 1701-1815. We continued with todays homework - Prussia 1800-1815. Then I handed out the following questions (and we decided who had the "responsibility" for what question):
Identify the German Confederation (Geopgraphy, population, ethnic groups, religion, politics, economy, etc...) - Laura and David
What were the strength and weaknesses of the German Confederation? - Alex
Describe the basic political system of the states within the German Confederation. - Axel
What forces or movements threatened the political system of the German states in the period 1815-1840's? - Alexander Mäkelä
Prince Clemens von Metternich was the dominant individual in German politics during the first half of the 19th century - Who was he? What ideas did he have? etc... - Seth
Explain the struggle between the "old" conservative system of the German states and the German Confederation against the "new" Nationalistic and Liberal ideas. (Daniel + all)
Identify and explain the economic development of Prussia and the German Confederation 1815-1848. - Beatrice
We will go through these questions during the next lesson!!!
Friday 2/10: We started this lesson by reading through the first answer (on the interactive whiteboard). We did some corrections and then we saved the version. The idea is to be able to cover your homework like this and when its ready - send it to your given email addresses. To be able to come through the texts faster I want you to send them to me before the lesson (latest 20.00 the day before = Thursday). We will work like this for a while and then evaluate the method! Because of the delays during this class you have the same homework to next week with the exception that you have to send me the papers the day before (at the latest!). I will send you an email this week just to see that communication works...
Friday 9/10: After some short recaputilation of the last lesson we continued with the answers to the questions;
Describe the basic political system of the states within the German Confederation. - Axel
What forces or movements threatened the political system of the German states in the period 1815-1840's? - Alexander Mäkelä
Prince Clemens von Metternich was the dominant individual in German politics during the first half of the 19th century - Who was he? What ideas did he have? etc... - Seth
Explain the struggle between the "old" conservative system of the German states and the German Confederation against the "new" Nationalistic and Liberal ideas. (Daniel + all)
Identify and explain the economic development of Prussia and the German Confederation 1815-1848. - Beatrice
You all participated well and I will send you the answers of your classmates. When we were done with the last questions the lesson was over. I had brought the next Chapter but only half the class had the time to download this Chapter. Make sure you get it during the week. You are supposed to read about the "REVOLUTION 1848" in the German Confederation and Prussia. Make sure you know the "CAUSES", "COURSE" and "RESULTS"! That's your homework for next Friday.
Friday 16/10: During this lesson we fully concentrated on the "CAUSES" of the 1848 Revolutions in the German Confederation and in Prussia. Here are some of the "Political" and "Economic" causes:
POLITICAL CAUSES
The rigid system of Absolute Monarchies
Liberalism - influence from France (1789, 1830, 1848)
Nationalism
Universities – radical students and teachers
Middle Class
Newspapers, journals and books
...more short term causes:
Baden – the liberals in Baden managed to obtain certain liberal rights in 1846 (relaxation of press censorship, reforms of the police, and reforms of the judicial system…)
Hesse-Darmstadt – strong liberal campaigns for changes in electoral rules and a free press
Bavaria– King Ludvig I replaced his more conservative advisors with liberal ones (so he could marry an exotic dancer and give her land+ title)
Prussia – Frederick Wilhelm IV was politically ambivalent. Sometimes he acted as a liberal ruler for a constitutional monarchy and sometimes he was an absolute ruler. When his father died in 1840 he released many political prisoners, abolished censorship, created an advisory body (but just on temporary basis), extended power to the provincial Diets and let them publish their debates. The more radical liberals then wanted more (the liberals in the Rhineland called for a constitution and a permanent Prussian Diet in Berlin) and the conservatives, especially the Junkers were considering a coup to replace the king. The kings reaction was to reinstate press censorship… (1843)
Hippenhelm meeting – 1847 (October); liberal representatives of the south-west German States met and demanded:
An elected national Diet
The liberation of the press
Open judicial proceedings with juries
The end of feudal restrictions
Reduction of the cost of the standing army and the creation of a national guard (a “people’s army")
Reform of the system of taxation
Austria – 1848; riots, demonstrations and revolution in Vienna – Metternich fled
Heidelberg – the “Declaration of Heidelberg” (March 5th 1848); 51 representatives from six German states met in Heidelberg (Prussia, Bavaria, Württemberg, Baden, Nassau and Frankfurt). They stated that a meeting of a national representation in all the German lands according to the number of the people should be arranged as soon as possible – this led to the “Vorparlament”
ECONOMIC CAUSES
Population increase – There had been a rapid and steady population increase since 1815. This population was to most extent rural (72% in 1848).
Agricultural economy – the rural overpopulation led to more landless peasants and laborers. When different problems hit the agricultural sector together with the beginning of a certain degree of mechanization several landless laborers lost their job and income. Some of them stayed and protested – others moved into urban areas.
Industrial economy – Industries and the Industrial Revolution was still not beyond its first stages in Central Europe. Prussia had 1200 steam engines 1848 – England had the same amount already in the year 1800 ( Austria only had 250 steam engines). In 1846 London consumed more coal than was mined in the whole of Prussia… The German factories were relatively small. In all of Germany there were only 600 000 industrial workers 1848.
Cheap mass-produced goods from Great Britain – This import caused a lot of problems for the German industry, especially the more skilled workers.
Revolts in Silesia 1844-1845 – Due to the problems with the cheap British goods the Silesian weavers saw a decline in their own linen industry. They therefore openly protested. These protests and demonstrations were brutally crushed!
Peasant revolts – Peasants in several parts of central Europe refused to perform their services to the landlords (in the Eastern parts they were basically still serfs forced to pay several feudal dues). Some of them even attacked manor houses and castles – others drifted into the urban areas where they added to the growing numbers of unemployed.
“CRISIS”
Potato blight 1845-1846 – This potato sickness was spread all over the German States. This led to shortages which led to protests, demonstrations and revolts especially in urban areas…
Drought 1847 – A widespread drought this year ruined most of the grain harvest. The bread prizes went up. Several bread riots (Stuttgart, Ulm,…)
Cholera – This terrible sickness had been calmer some years but now when people experienced certain famine and were weakened the Cholera came back and hit the German States
Skilled workers protests – In the beginning of 1848 artisans burned mills in Düsseldorf, the weavers of Chemnitz protested and the wagoners of Nassau assaulted the newly constructed railroads… (“LUDDISM”)
1848 February-March – Strikes and demonstrations all over the German States (mostly in urban areas) against:
Food shortages
High Food Prices (the Cereal prices had gone up 50% in 1847)
Low Wages
Long Working Hours
Poor Working Conditions
Poor Living Conditions
Unemployment
That was it... (if you see something I forgot so please email me). We will continue with the 1848 situation during the next lesson. I would like all of you to also read through Chapter 3...
Friday 6/11: We repeated some of the causes of the 1848 revolution from the last lesson. Then we started to cover the "COURSE" of the 1848 revolution in the German Confederation. This included the "VORPARLAMENT" ("Preparatory Parlament"):
VORPARLAMENT
How was it formed? At a meeting in Heidelberg in the beginning of March 1848, 51 representatives from six German states (Prussia, Bavaria, Wurttemberg, Baden Nassau and Frankfurt) decided to issue a declaration which proposed "a meeting of a national representation elected in all the German lands...". Invitations were sent out to the different Assemblies and Diets in all the German states and at the end of March (31st of March) 1848, 574 representatives met in Frankfurt.
Who was in this parlament? The representatives came from all of the German states but their was a big variety. Austria sent only two representatives, Prussia sent 141 but the South German representatives predominated. Most of these men were a result of the "March Revolution" in nearly all German states. The newly established assemblies/diets discussed the question about a national parlament and then appointed the representatives. These were the ones that gathered in the Pauluskirche (St Paul's Church) on March 31st 1848.
You can find this text on the Pauluskirche in Frankfurt
What decissions did they take?
They agreed on the election of a National Parliament that would draw up a constitution for a united Germany
The new Constituent Parliament would meet in Frankfurt
The Parliament should consist of one representative for every 50 000 inhabitants
The representatives should be elected by citizens who were of age and "economically independent"
It was up to each state to decide who was an economically independent citizen. Several groups were excluded; women, servants, farm laborers, anyone receiving poor relief, etc...
FRANKFURT PARLIAMENT
The new Constituent National Parliament is often called the "FRANKFURT PARLIAMENT". It existed between May 1848 to June 1849.
How was it formed? At the "Vorparlament" it was decided that all German states should have an election and choose the representatives to the Frankfurt Parliament. The delegates choosen did not represent the population as a whole - most of them had just been prominent men in the local community. 596 members were elected.
Who was in this parlament? With the new strong ideas of nationalism and liberalism it's no surprise that the vast majority of the representatives were from the "middle class". Teachers, professors, lawyers and government officials were over represented. It's said to have been the best educated German Parliament ever - over 80% had a university degree! There were very few landowners, four craftsmen and only one peasant.
What decissions did they take? The new parliament had as the general task to make a new Constitution. They also wanted to discuss:
Freedom of the Press
Fair taxation
Equality of political rights without regard to religion
German citizenship for all
The parliament started by declaring that the new constitution would include much stronger centralized power where the German Parliament in much would control the individual states. Then they started to work on the "smaller" questions. Lack of a well-organized party system and without any outstanding leaders the Frankfurt Parliament became a forum for 596 different ideas and wills. An old Austrian Archduke, John, was meanwhile elected as Regent ("Imperial Vicar"). He appointed a number of Ministers, but without any staff, offices, money or their duties defined they could not do anything. It took to December 1848 until the Frankfurt Parliament presented and approved some of the points above. The "Fifty Articles" included:
equality before the law
freedom of worship
freedom of the press
freedom of arrest without warrant
an end to discrimination because of class
Problems and weakness (except all the different wills, the lack of leadership or/and political parties + a weak Regent without any staff, offices and money...):
The Assembly did not have any big funds which made it impossible to create an armed force to defend them (no rights of taxation - no army)
The rulers of the larger states like Austria, Prussia and Hanover refused to swear an oath of allegiance to the Imperial Vicar
The Assembly supported a war against Denmark about the Duchies of Schleswig-Holstein 1848-1850. The Prussian army was forced back by the international response. This weakened the authority of the Frankfurt Assembly since they had failed as the ”Champion of German Nationalism”
No foreign country recognized the new Assembly (except Hungary and USA )
The Refusal to consider a social program. The demands of social reforms came particularly from the Socialists (on of the most influential criticizer was the editor of the New Rhenish Gazette - Karl Marx).
In September the Assembly was barely saved from rioters protesting against the failure in Schleswig-Holstein and the lack of interest for social reforms. Two conservative members were murdered. The Assembly had failed to win popular support and the liberals were alarmed by the revolutionary disorder...
Another problem that occurred was the extent of the territory to which the new constitution should apply:
Grossdeutschland (Greater Germany) included all of Germany and the Habsburg Empire (Hungary, Lombardy; Venetia as well as the Czechs...)
Kleindeutchland (Little Germany) excluded the Austrian Empire altogether
The Assembly had already rejected a Republic in favor of a Federal Empire. The Empire should be ruled by a hereditary Emperor, but he had to accept a liberal constitution which thus would give him limited power. As a temporary Regent an old Austrian Archduke, John, was elected (as described above). In March 1849 the assembly elected Frederick William IV of Prussia to the position of Emperor. He rejected the offer since it restricted his authority. This rejection marked the end of the Frankfurt Assembly. Other German rulers ordered the members from their states to leave Frankfurt. Several states now repealed the constitutions they accepted in 1848 which made the majority leave the Assembly. The remaining 130 radical members moved to Stuttgart, but in June the Assembly was shut down with military help. In December the Archduke John renounced his title.
PRUSSIA 1848
Due to the success of the Revolution in March a new Prussian Constituent Assembly was elected by indirect universal suffrage. It met in Berlin from May to December when it was dissolved by the King. The Prussian Constituent Assembly of 1848;
Consisted of some 400 members. Many were officials, lawyers, teachers - very few noblemen and landowners. It also consisted of 68 peasants (mostly from East Prussia )
In December the Assembly was dissolved - Why?
The disorder in Berlin grew steadily
Unemployment rose which caused many demonstrations and protests
The liberal middle-class withdrew their support of the Assembly
The Assembly estranged itself from the King
The new more conservative Government (appointed by the King in November) adjourned the Assembly and ordered it to meet outside of Berlin
When they refused the King sent in troops, proclaimed martial laws and dissolved the Assembly. This was done without any major demonstrations or protests...
The situation in Berlin grew steadily more disorderly. Unemployment rose, and there were numerous demonstrations and processions. The middle-class liberals became hostile to the Assembly, which was estranging itself from the monarchy. The time had come for the King to act...
Early in November he replaced his liberal ministers by a conservative government. The new government adjourned the Assembly and ordered it to meet at the town of Brandenburg (60 km away from Berlin). They refused. Then the King ordered 13 000 troops into the city and put it under martial law. The Civic Guards were abolished. This was done without any bloodshed or opposition from the industrial workers of Berlin . In December the King dissolved the Assembly.
New Prussian Constitution 1850
When the New Prussian Constitution came it was introduced by royal edict! King Frederick William IV provided for a Diet with an Upper and Lower Chamber:
Herrenhaus (Upper Chamber). Princes, heads of nobility, some life peers and a few repr. of provinces, large towns and universities
Landtag (Lower Chamber). 443 members chosen by open voting by electors. A division of the electors into three classes according to the taxation they paid reassured the influence of the wealthy class. The workers and peasants, although they together comprised the vast majority of the electorate, only received a third of the seats, and the property-owners had many more.
Autocratic Constitution. The King appointed his own ministers who were responsible to him alone. He also had the right to make laws without any influence from the Diet or his ministers. The Diet could only consider bills submitted to them by the King!
Enlarged Autocracy. Through his power King Frederick William IV curbed the freedom of the Press, forbade public meetings and imprisoned political opponents without a trial...
ERFURT UNION
After the events of 1848-49 the prestige of the Prussian State became higher. Austria had at the same time been engaged with the Empire and seemed to lose ground towards Prussia. Baron Josef von Radowitz, adviser to King Frederick William IV of Prussia, presented a set of proposals in Erfurt March 1850. The proposal, the ”Erfurt Union”, included:
A union of the North German states under the presidency of the King of Prussia
A union of the North German states under the protection of the Prussian army
Austria would be directly excluded from the Erfurt Union since it just concerned the North German states, but von Radowitz proposed a compromise by which Austria could be linked to the Union by a second, wider union, based upon free trade and perhaps upon a common foreign policy...
The proposal was based on monarchical principles against any radical, liberal nationalistic ideas
This suggestion was met with protests.
Several German states feared Prussian hegemony as much as a liberal revolt
11 states, including Hanover, Bavaria , Saxony and Württemberg, refused to send representatives to Erfurt
Austria had recovered from the revolts 1848-49 and declared that ”we shall not letourselves be thrown out of Germany ”...
Austria insisted on the reconstruction of the German Confederation
CAPITULATION IN OLMÜTZ
A constitutional conflict in the small duchy of Hesse-Cassel provided the test between the two German powers; the Erfurt Union under Prussian dominance and the German Confederation under Austrian dominance. When Russia expressed support for Austria the Prussian King Frederick William IV gave in. Prussia agreed to abandon the Erfurt Union at a meeting in Olmütz in December 1850. This ”Capitulation in Olmütz” led to revival of the German Confederation under Austrian presidency.
Agatha Ramm has described the coming years as a period of ”sterile parliamentarianism within the states and sterile diplomacy without” (although foreign affairs as the Crimean War and the unification of Italy plus Prussian economic development would eventually change the balance in Germany). An Austrian attempt to expand the Confederation to include Austria’s non-German territories was rejected and another Austrian attempt to control the German economy by the linking of the Zollverein to the Austrian and produce a vast central European economic union was also rejected. The states of the German Confederation wanted to keep their independence…
This is where we ended. I then gave you the task to make a PP presentation to our next lesson. You will work on the following topics:
The German Confederation 1850-1863
Prussia 1850-1863
The Danish-Prussian War 1864
The Austro-Prussian War 1866
The Franco-Prussian War 1870-71
See you next Friday...
Friday 12/11 / 19/11: We started to go through the topics above. Here are the different PP presentations;
Friday 11/12: Today we will work on the following topics: GERMANY 1871-1890 You find the necessary information on this website and in Chapter 5. You can also look in "Lee" and browse the internet. This presentation will take place next year - Friday January 8th!
Friday 8/1: First of all!!! We will not have the test next Friday (15/1)! Since three students from HL will be away the Friday after (22/1) we will discuss other options during the coming week! At this lesson we went through the following presentations:
We will do the last topics during the next lesson. Then we will also summarize what we have done, look at different question possibilities and finally decide test time the following week!
Friday 15/1: First of all!!! The test will be next Friday (22/1)! First we went through two "expressions". Realpolitik = realistic, practical or actual politik (politics). Refers to politics or diplomacy based primarily on practical considerations, rather than ideological notions.Pragmatic = solving problems in a realistic way which suits the present conditions rather than obeying fixed theories, ideas or rules. Then we covered more of Bismarck's realpolitik - in this case the following presentations:
This concluded our work with the German Unification. I then handed out 15 questions:
Assess the relative importance of the Zollverein and Bismarck’s policies in bringing about the unification of Germany.
”No man has had so great an effect on Germany and none a more profound effect on Europe.” Evaluate this quotation on the career and importance of Bismarck.
What were the main problems faced by Bismarck after 1871 and how successfully did he solve them?
Explain how the inherent strength of Prussia combined with Bismarck’s political skills achieved German unification.
To what extent is it true to say that Bismarck gave Germany many years of prosperity and legal government, and Europe a period of peace?
What advantages and disadvantages did Bismarck inherit when he became Minister President of Prussia in 1862 and how did he use the advantages to bring about German unification?
Compare and contrast Bismarck’s policies before and after 1871.
In 1867, Bismarck said: ”Anyone who has looked into the eyes of a soldier dying on the battlefield will think hard before starting a war.” Analyze Bismarck’s foreign policy in the light of these words.
To what extent should Bismarck receive credit for the unification of Germany?
Analyze the aims, successes and failures of Bismarck’s domestic policies 1871 to 1890.
It has been claimed that Germany was united ”more by coal and iron than by blood and iron”. How far do you agree that economic power contributed more to the unification of Germany than did the military victories of the 1860s?
Compare and contrast Bismarck’s policies towards Austria and France between 1862 and 1871.
Why was it that Prussia, rather than Austria, had achieved the dominant position in Germany by 1866?
”Bismarck’s policies both at home and abroad, between the years 1871 and 1890, merely stored up problems for the future, both for Germany and Europe.” To what extent do you agree with this verdict?
How successful was Bismarck as Chancellor in his foreign policies between 1862 and 1890?
I will choose 5 of the questions above for the Friday in-class-essay. The three stduents who will not participate gets to write this test one afternoon the coming week. We will agree to time and date this week. Remember that you always produce a question in your introduction and that you try to state your intentions (make a short outline). The introduction should not be more then a few sentences... Good Luck!!!
Friday 22/1: In-class-essay about the unification of Germany. The three students missing have to come to a decission about when they could do this essay next week. Check my schedule (click here) and then decide. As far as I can see it on your schedules it could work out Wednesday 15.10 (then N213 is available) - right after your Math lessons. OK?
Friday 29/1: Well - Thursday worked OK as well. During this lesson we started a new topic - Russia 1855-1894. To be able to understand what was going on in Russia during this period it's important to start with the previous Tsar - Nicholas I:
Reaction on the Decembrist Revolt of 1825: The Decembrist revolt was one early attempt to change the old Russian autocratic system. It was some Russian officers who at December 26th, 1825, tried to take advantage of the confusion following the death of Alexander I. The Decembrist conspirators were of liberal inclination, and their background was Russian freemasonry and the Russian army. The Masonic lodges, where men were treated as equals irrespective of their official rank, in effect were semi-secret societies where those of similar views could meet and make plans. Although Alexander I banned all freemasonry, it was too late to prevent some of the masons forming new and completely secret societies with revolutionary aims. Prominent among those who realized that drastic changes were needed were Russian army men, especially those who had been in the army of occupation in France. They had observed conditions in France, where there were no serfs, where there was relative freedom of speech and of the press, where there were regular judicial processes, where there was a constitution of sorts, and where new ideas circulated and were openly discussed. The Decembrists failed because they were divided among themselves, had made no real preparations for their revolt, refused to make use of discontent among the masses, and were mentally prepared in advance for a glorious failure. Another reason was the fact that the leaders of the revolt didn't show up...
His personal revulsion against the spread of radical ideas in Europe (increased with the deposition of Charles X by the French in 1830, by the Polish revolt of 1831 (A strong reaction against the attempt to westernize Poland) and by the uprisings all over Europe in 1848).
Support from the Orthodox Church. Throughout the 19th century the Orthodox Church, with its message of faith in God and unquestioning submission to God’s will, was the major support of the Tsarist regime. The Tsar also held the position as titular ”Head of the Church”
The Russian "Constitution of 1832" - ”Collected Laws of the Russian Empire”. According to the "Constitution" (not a real Constitution);
The Tsar made all final decisions to Russia’s government, army, economy and foreign relations. The other bodies of government were just administrative or advisory
The three bodies of administration and advice’s were;
The Imperial Council (or His Imperial Majesty’s Private Chancery. The Third Section of this Chancery was in charge of state security, standing at the centre of a complex web of censorship and surveillance)
The Committee of Ministers (8 )
The Senate
A Paternal system. ”The Tsar is a father. His subjects are his children, and children ought never to reason about their parents.” This opinion is also a reason why the government so strictly was in the hands of the Tsar.
Nationality - slavophiles. A conviction that Russian social organization, religion, government, culture and philosophy were superior of the system of western Europe; ”slavophiles” against ”westernizers”. Russia and the Tsar also saw it as a duty to protect the Slavs against all external threats. The effect of Western liberalism and nationalism which resulted in the Polish revolt 1831 is an example of this. It was ruthlessly suppressed and resulted in the abolition of many important elements of Polish national identity. The Polish constitution was withdrawn, the universities closed and the Russian language was more vigorously imposed in Polish public life. During the 19th century Russia also saw itself as the protector of the Slavs and the Orthodox Christians in the declining Ottoman Empire. This view would lead to problems…
The Serfdom. Even though Tsar Nicholas I recognized serfdom as ”in its present situation in our country is an evil, palpable and obvious to all, but to attack it now would be something still more harmful.” (1842). The serfdom supported the autocratic system, not only because the state owned 19 millions ”state peasants”, but also because of the allegiance of the serf to the landowner. This was combined with the allegiance of the landowner to the Tsar to constitute the whole political hierarchy upon which the stability of Russia seemed to depend.
Lack of industrial development. This prevented the development of an urban middle class, or of an urban work force. This preserved the rigid system of serfdom.
This is where I ended the lecture part. We will continue next Friday with the foreign policies of Nicholas I and we will spend some time on the "Crimean War". At the end of this lesson I handed your tests back (Unification of Germany - Bismarck). It was a very varied result - from not passing to 7... I handed out markbands, grade boundaries and markscheme. I hope that you will understand the grades and my comments - otherwise ask me when we meet next time.
Friday 5/2: NO CLASS! Back problems (lumbago)
Friday 12/1: Three of the HL Students were absent due to a competition... We still tried to get a few things done. We focused on the Crimean War - the causes, it's course and the results; both for Russia and Europe. Part of this will be repeated during the next lesson (Friday 26/2) when we will try to summarize the situation in Russia before Alexander II came into power. Have a good vacation!
Friday 26/1: I wrote the following questions on the whiteboard:
What role did the Russian nobility and the Orthodox Church play during the earlier part of the 19th century?
Try in words to describe the political situation under Tsar Nicholas I as well as his political beliefs…
“The Russian economy was based on backward Agriculture in the middle of the 19th century”. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Russia’s foreign policy was quite successful between the years 1812-1854 – do you agree?
What were the main causes of the Crimean War 1854-1856?
What were the main results of the Crimean War – for Russia and for Europe?
Then I gave you 15 minutes to prepare the first answer. I wrote the answer in "steps". We agreed on the following answer:
Step 1 – Identify the Russian political system; Autocracy!
Step 2 – Identify the main groups/classes in the Russian society; Aristocrats (Officers), Orthodox Church, Serfs – State Peasants, Peasants, very small Middle Class (Merchants, Industrialists, Intellectuals, Civil Service…),
Step 3 – Orthodox Church supported the autocratic system of the “Divine Will”… and the Tsar supported the Orthodox Church as the only trustworthy church. The main support for the Autocratic system through education and religious services…
Step 4 – The Aristocracy – The autocratic regime relied heavily on the Aristocracy; as Provincial Governors, big landowners, enforcers of law and order (military and police) – “mini-Tsars”! The Tsar acknowledges their position through “rewards”; titles, privileges…
Step 5 – Nationalism (Slavophiles) – strongly supported by the Orthodox Church)
Step 6 – Discussion of support and non-support of the thesis… (Weakness and strength of this thesis)…
Step 7 – Conclusion
The idea of this exercise was to train you to do outlines - to clearly identify how you should approach an IB question. Since the group is inteeligent we also get the benefit of several persons answers and can thereby put together a "model answer". Your homework is to do question 2 and 3 - two outlines! We will cover them fast at the beginning of the next lesson and then we will cover the other three questions together. You will then have 6 "model answers". You will find the necessary information in Morris (pages 37-41). This will also give you enough knowledge of the period of Nicholas I. To be able to answer the foreign policy questions you also need to read Morris pages 42-43, the following link "Nicholas I" and Lee pages 67-74. See you Friday next week!
Friday 5/3: I started this lesson by talking about the importance of "outlines". That's why we are now working with "Essay Questions" when we cover Russian History right before Alexander II. After this we covered question 2 and 3;
2. Try in words to describe the political situation under Tsar Nicholas I as well as his political beliefs…
3. “The Russian economy was based on backward Agriculture in the middle of the 19th century”. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
We then started the fourth question;
4. Russia’s foreign policy was quite successful between the years 1812-1854 – do you agree?
Please do the rest of question 4 + all of question 5 and 6 at home (fairly short outlines - not more than one side of a page long - for each question);
5. What were the main causes of the Crimean War 1854-1856?
6. What were the main results of the Crimean War – for Russia and for Europe?
See you next week...
Friday 12/3: I asked the class to see their outlines... One student had done them (or at least had them with her to class...). Not very promising. To go through these outlines always goes faster and are more efficient if everybody has done them. Now we spent this class going through the three questions which were your homework:
4. Russia’s foreign policy was quite successful between the years 1812-1854 – do you agree?
5. What were the main causes of the Crimean War 1854-1856?
6. What were the main results of the Crimean War – for Russia and for Europe?
The good news is that we did get through them. When we see each other next week we will cover the domestic policies of Alexander II, so please read Morris 42-54. Make sure you can answer the following question in class; "Was Alexander II a liberator?"
Friday 19/3: Before I started to write anything on the whiteboard we discussed the approach towards todays big question "Was Alexander II a liberator?". Somebody said that it would have been better to call him "Tsar Reformer"...
When we investigate Alexander II's reforms it's good to start with the "BIG ONE" - the Emancipation of the Serfs! So why did Tsar Alexander II emancipate the serfs?
My answer to that question was connected to the fact that Russia just had lost a war (the Crimean War) which affected the country in many differen ways. One part that was affected was the economy. It was weak before the war and the lost war did definitely not make it better. This was, according to several historians, the main factor behind the emancipation. Russia and the economy of Russia needed to be modernized badly. The serfsystem was counterproductive - it drained money and resources...
If we look at the reform itself it was not very successful;
EMANCIPATION OF THE SERFS. The institution of serfdom recognized the ownership of one man, woman or family by another, and involved the total subjection of the serf to the will of his or her owner. In 1858, 31 per cent of Russia’s population of 74 million, that is some 22.5 million persons, were serfs. In addition over 19 million were ”state peasants”, tied to lands owned by the crown. The authority of their owners, sometimes delegated to the elders of the peasant commune (the mir), was almost absolute.
Nicholas I legislation did away with some of the most inhuman aspects of the institution, forbidding the splitting up of families by the sale of individuals (1833), and banning the auctioning of serfs (1841).
By the Edict of Emancipation of 1861, Tsar Alexander II ended the system of serfs. The Edict freed them from serfdom and provided them with some land (usually to small and "poor"). This land was initially paid for by the State (in government bonds), and the peasants then had to repay the debt. The landlords rarely hesitated to compensate themselves for the loss of free serf labor by inflating the estimated value of the land.
The ”mir” became responsible to the state for collecting the redemption dues (regularly payments over 49 years) as well as the taxes. To ensure that peasants would not escape their debts, the mir issued passports and until 1903 no peasant could leave his village without a passport and the consent of the mir. The peasants could not sell or mortgage the land to anybody outside his local mir. Instead of being a serf under a landlord he was now a serf under the mir!
Impact of emancipation: Some historians said it had a great impact, (Hugh Seton-Watson - compares it with the less peaceful and less successful emancipation in USA) others said it was a ”fraud” (Lionel Kochan). Morris claims that it would be more correct to talk about ”that serfdom was abolished rather than that the serfs had been emancipated.” He gives four reasons for this;
1. The process was slow, dictated by the needs of the individual landowner.
2. The settlement made upon the ex-serfs was usually unsatisfactory. The serf got to little and the landowner saw to it that he got as much as possible.
3. Many peasants resented the redemption payments of property that they thought belong to them from the very beginning.
4. As mentioned, the serf was freed from the landowner but became a serf under the mir. In the shorter run, emancipation did not seem to solve the twin problems of rural unrest and industrial backwardness.
One success with the reform was that it forced the Tsar to make a few other reforms;
New local governments - Zemstvos. One consequence of the emancipation was the need to replace the local government, consisting of serf-owning landlords before 1861. Alexander II did this in 1864 when he approved the reform of setting up ”zemstvos” - local Parliaments, elected by an electoral collage system that gave most votes to the richest citizens. The members of each zemstvo were to be responsible for transport, health, education, the poor, famine relief, and the encouragement of agriculture and industry in their area. Zemstvos only existed in European Russia. In 1870 similar assemblies were formed in the urban districts - town councils ("Dumas"). These local assemblies could have been a step away from the old autocracy, but the system of voting and their established local reputations made it easy for the conservative nobility to dominate. At provincial level they occupied 74 per cent of all zemstvo seats in 1865-67. When suggestions came up to form a central, national body with delegates from different zemstvos the Tsar ”sharply reminded them of the limitations upon their powers”. Seton-Watson claims that this was where Alexander stood at the crossroads between autocracy and liberal reforms. Having whetted the appetite for the latter, he remained committed to the former (maybe with the exception of his last year…).
Reforms of the legal system. From 1865 a new legal system replaced the old ”summary justice of the landlord.” It made the legal proceedings public, included all the classes of society, introduced a common jury system and saw to it that judges were independent of the government. Seton-Watson claims that these were remarkable reforms, ensuring that ”the court room was the one place in Russia where real freedom of speech prevailed.”
Military reforms. The disasters of the Crimean war made apparent the need of changes within the military system. The minister of war, Dmitri Milyutin, got this responsibility. Florinsky and other Russian historians has ”hailed” this man for being one of the few outstanding statesmen of imperial Russia. Milyutin
1. Reduced the term of service from 25 years (”life sentence”) to a period of six years.
2. He introduced universal military service (1874) to which all males were liable at 20 years of age (no loopholes for the rich and the nobility).
3. He abolished the more brutal form of military punishment and military service as a punishment for criminal offenses.
4. He also took away the ”military colonies” an institution where the sons of long-term service men were sent to be trained as the next generation of soldiers.
Educational reforms. The numbers of university students were allowed to rise again in 1855. European government (1857) and philosophy (1860) was permitted once more. A new University Statute (1863) gave the universities more autonomy in their own affairs.
These were the reforms. We will discuss a few more reforms next time and then we will discuss the opposition to Alexanders reforms.... See you next Friday (26/3)...
Friday 26/3: Before I started to write anything on the whiteboard I talked briefly about a few more "reforms";
Censorship: General censorship was tight under Nicholas I. When Alexander II first came into power it relaxed for some time. In 1865 a relative Press Law was published. It baically abolished preliminary cesnsorship; for example it listed all current publications (if their publishers stated this desire), original writings over 160 printed pages, all government publications, all publications of academics, universities and learned societies/institutions, all publications in the ancient classical languages and translations from those languages + sketches, diagrams and maps. Still - general censorship remained and several journals and papers were warned or even prohibited.
Still - this relative freedom (for being Russia) made the amount of new books published double every year between 1855 and 1864, and trebled between 1864 and 1881.
Economic Reforms. Between 1862 and 1878 Reutern served as Minister of Finance. He modernized the Russian economy;
He introduced a new efficient centralized administration
In 1863 he replaced the old system of farming out licenses to sell certain goods with a system of excise duties
He modernized and streamlined the fiscal organization of the state
He stimulated the building of several railroad networks (In 1855 Russia had less than 700 miles of railroad - in 1881 Russia had more then 14,000 miles). Much of this new railroad system connected the main agrarian areas with the local and regional markets as well as the harbors for export (In 1864 Russia exported 26 million tons - by 1880 Russia exported more then 86 million tons)
He inspired the set up of a modern banking system. At 1855 the majority of Russians relied on moneylenders whenever they needed a loan - by 1878 there were 278 municipal banks, 727 loan/savings associations, 566 joint-stock companies and 33 joint-stock commercial banks. Now it was finally possible for Russia to start an industrial revolution (but it still took some years)
Less strict rules for the Jewish population; The Jewish population of Russia lived under very strict rules that limited their trade as well as the places where they could live. Some of the old restrictions were taken away during the reign of Alexander II:
1855 - Jews of the "First Guild" (paid above a certain amount in taxes) and all foreign Jews could now settle and trade anywhere in Russia (extended to Jews that had served in some specific regiments in 1860 and extended to all Jews that had served as soldiers in 1867
Jewish Artisans (1865) were allowed to move into the cities and towns of Russia
Still - anti-semitism was well established:
Several Jewish schools were closed (after 1863)
Limitation on Jewish representation after 1863
Russia had at this time developed two main groups/movements that caused certain tension in the society; Westernizers and Slavophiles
Pan-slavism: The slavophile movement was also going through a new phase. Nikolai Danilyevski wrote ”Russia and Europe” in 1871. He rejected the Western philosophy and forwarded a more aggressive support for Russia’s Slav nature and inheritance. He preached a union of all Slav nations under Russian leadership stretching from the Baltic to the Adriatic. This regeneration of aggressive, autocratic nationalism was called pan-slavism.
Then I covered "Opposition" in Russia: The Tsar was criticized from both sides - the conservatives resented the loss of influence and privilege and the liberals became frustrated at the Tsar´s refusal to take his reforms to their logical conclusion. More radical and revolutionary forms of opposition developed as Alexander’s reign progressed. In some ways the reforms created this ”hot” political atmosphere.
The most important names on the Russian left in the 1850s and the 1860s were the "Intelligentia" - Alexander Herzen (exiled in 1848. Published a journal ”The Bell” (Kolokol) from London), NikolaiChernyshevsky (part of then literary radicalism of the 1850s. He claimed that reforms were impossible without a fundamental alteration of Russia’s political and economical bases. His novel ”What is to be Done?” inspired the next generation) and D. I. Pisarev (he advised his followers to not ”accept any single principle on trust, however much respect surrounds that principle”. This principle to accept nothing of the existing society without question was named ”nihilism” (nihil (lat.) - nothing)).
Populism was a movement that dominated Russian radicalism in the mid 1870s. The basic idea was to re-educate the Russian peasantry. In 1874-75 3,000 young radicals invaded the countryside to open the eyes of the population to their plight and show them the sources of salvation This movement ”To the People” was a depressing failure. Over 1,600 of these populists (narodniki) were arrested between 1873-77, often handed over to the police by the peasants! A breakaway group calling itself ”Land and Liberty” (Zemlya i Volya) made some progress in the following years. Members of ”Land and Liberty” also founded the first unions for Russian industrial workers in Odessa (1875) and in St. Petersburg (1878).
Terrorism was the more attractive alternative for those with less patience. The first attempt on the life of the Tsar was in 1866 when a student shot at him in the streets of St. Petersburg . In 1879 a split in the ranks of ”Land and Liberty” gave birth to a group called ”The Peoples Will” (Narodnaya Volya) that advocated violence as the trigger to general revolution. Although other government officials were among their early victims, their chief target was always the Tsar himself. Attempts to shoot him, dynamite the royal train and explosives in the Winter Palace came within a year 1879-80. In March 1881 they succeeded!
Was Tsar Alexander II ever liberal? Most historians would claim that even though Alexander II was a reformer he never wanted to change the political system - the Autocracy! Other historians see some liberal attempts - especiall during his lat years:
Alexander had during the latter part of his reign showed that he remained committed to an autocratic system, though there was maybe an attempt to go back to a more liberal system during his last years… When Alexander's first wife died in 1880, he married the much younger Princess Dolgoruky. She was the friend and patron of a number of liberal politicians. It was under this period a liberal politician; Mikhail Loris-Melikov was appointed Minister of the Interior. He managed to abolish the Third Section (as described before, the Third Section was a part of the Imperial Council or His Imperial Majesty’s Private Chancery, and this section was in charge of state security). Loris-Melikov also managed to replace one of the most reactionary ministers - Dmitri Tolstoy (Ministry of Education). Right before Alexander II was killed he had just given his personal approval for calling in a national assembly, partly of nominated members, but also elected representatives of the zemstvos and the town councils. The Soviet historian P. A. Zaionchkovsky concedes that ”in the conditions of an increasingly complex situation it might have been the beginning of the establishment of a parliamentary system in Russia”. This came to a stop when Alexander was killed by the second of two bombs thrown at his sledge in a St Petersburg street.
We will continue with the domestic policies of Alexander III after the vacation - please read Morris pages 54-57...
Friday 23/4: It's a long time since we saw each other.I asked you to please tell me about the reforms of Alexander II. Then we talked about his last years and tried to evaluate if it was a serious liberal attempt or not. After this repetition we came into todays lesson - the domestic policies of Alexander III and the domestic development of Russia after 1881. I wrote the following things on the whiteboard:
ALEXANDER III (1881-1894)
”Autocracy, Orthodoxy and Russification”
Background: Influenced by his Tutor (and later his Advisor) Konstantin Pobedonostsev who was very reactionary:
True believer in Autocracy
Against Democracy
Orthodox (Procurator of the Holy Synod = lay supervisor of the Orthodox Church)
Against all other religions and sects
Anti-Semite: “One third of the Jews should be killed, one third should be forced to emigrate and one third should be assimilated”
Russian! Against all minorities of Russia …
Restrictions against the Zemstvo/Dumas (local administrations) and the courts
Land Commandants – a new office introduced by Alexander III in 1889
Land Commandants had to belong to the nobility
Land Commandants sat in the local administration (Zemstvo/Dumas) and had senior administrative and judicial power – over-riding the authority of the local administration
Land Commandants replaced the Office of Justice of the Peace in local courts
More restrictions of the local administrations - Laws 1890 and 1892
Restricted the popular vote to the Zemstvo/Dumas
A list of candidates to the local administration replaced the previous ability to freely vote for Zemstvo/Duma deputies
The suggestions and proposals from the local administrations were often obstructed and undermined
Restrictions against Elementary and Higher Education
The influence of the local clergy (Orthodox Church) in elementary schools expanded a lot during the reign of Alexander III – In 1897 over 79% of the population was illiterate
1884 – Law that limited the administrative autonomy of Higher Education
1887 – Tuition fees were raised
Other signs of “REACTION”
Russification. This now included areas that had relative autonomy - therefore they had been loyal to the Tsar: Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Armenia… The attempts of Russification did not lead to more obedience – rather the opposite; resistance and cries for total independence!
EX: Finland (started during the time of Alexander III but this sample comes from the reign of Nicholas II)
1899 – The Finnish Diet was deprived of nearly all their legislative rights – protests…
1903 – The Russian Governor-General Nikolai Bobrikov was given dictatorial power so he could crush the opposition
1904 – Bobrikov was assassinated – this could have lead to repression but…
1905 – Finland temporarily got the old constitution back
Anti-Semitism. Why – Jews had participated in the Polish Rebellion 1863 and one of the assassinators of Alexander II was Jewish (Hessia Helfmann). Methods:
Ghettos for Jews were created in urban areas
1881-1905 – over 215 cases of “pogroms” (pogrom = persecution of Jews)
Jews were forbidden to make any new settlements in rural areas
Jews were not allowed to trade on Christian holidays
Special quotas for Jews in schools and higher education
Kiev 1886 – all “illegal” Jews were expelled from the city
Moscow 1891 – all “illegal” Jews were expelled from the city
REACTION: Several Jews emigrated. Other joined the Zionist movement or became revolutionaries. In 1897 “Bund” was founded (part of the Socialist Movement in Russia and also part of the Russian Social Democratic Party which was founded the year after – 1898)
More signs of “REACTION”
The liberal Minister of Interior Loris-Melikov was replaced by Nikolai Ignatiev who later was replaced by Dmitry Tolstoy…
Lenin’s brother Alexander was executed in 1886 accused of plotting to kill the Tsar
Supervision of Universities and Courts
Censorship and supervision of the Press
ECONOMY
Industrialization…
Development of railroads – linked major areas of industrial development to important markets + linked the areas of agricultural production with the ports of the Black Sea
1883 – the Batum–Baku railroad. Linked the Caspian Sea with the Black Sea. This increased the Russian oil production a lot!
1891 – Start of the construction of the Trans-Siberian railroad
Tariffs:
In the 1870’s low tariffs
Late 1870’s – tariffs began to rise
1891 – the “Great Protective Tariffs”. These tariffs especially protected the Russian coal and pig iron production
Sergei Witte became Minister of Finance 1892
More protective tariffs
Foreign investments and foreign capital in Russian industries
Russian currency put on the Gold Standard
W.O. Henderson (Economic Historian) – “The Russian economy was still backward in some respects, it was also true that vigorous state action, foreign capital and foreign machinery had given Russia a powerful impetus on the road to industrialization”
Lenin (1899) – “If we compare the present rapidity of development with that which could be achieved with the modern level of technique and culture, the present rate of development of capitalism in Russia really must be considered slow”
November 1st 1894 – Alexander III died! His son Nicholas II took over at the age of 26. His first comment when he heard his father was dead was: “What am I to do? I am not prepared to be Tsar. I know nothing of the business of ruling”.
I did not cover all the parts above - we ended right after "Start of the construction of the Trans-Siberian railroad". I will cover the rest next lesson - and Alexander II and Alexander III's foreign policies. Your homework is to read about theirforeign policies in Morris pages 57-59.