IB3 HIGHER LEVEL - LESSONS
NOTE: The lessons you HL have together with SL are published on IB3SL. Here is a link:
Link to IB3SL
 
HIGHER LEVEL ONLY
IB3BG Friday 4/9: We discussed shortly what we did last semester - Mussolini and Italy 1922-1939. I handed out an overview of the long-term and short-term factors that helped Mussolini coming into power as well as his consolidation of power. We read through it loud. Some of this information is gathered here: Italy. Then I handed out two different papers. One dealt with Mussolini as a Dictator. Was he;
- in sole control of Italy and its government?
- sharing power with the Fascist Party that had helped him into power?
- sharing power with the King and the "Elite" who were still to powerful to ignore?
You need to evaluate Mussolinis position to next class (in two weeks - Friday 18/9). Write significance arguments and bring them to class.
The other paper was an evaluation of Mussolinis economic policies. To this paper you got the task to write "YES" and "NO" arguments. The question - "Were Mussolini's economic policies successful?" We will gather all the arguments next time and see how we can use them in a future essay. The last thing we did was to set the date for an in-class-essay about Mussolini - Friday October 9th (Week 41)!

IB3BD Tuesday 8/9: We discussed shortly what we did last semester - Mussolini and Italy 1922-1939. I handed out an overview of the long-term and short-term factors that helped Mussolini coming into power as well as his consolidation of power. We read through it loud. Some of this information is gathered here: Italy. Then I handed out two different papers. One dealt with Mussolini as a Dictator. Was he;
- in sole control of Italy and its government?
- sharing power with the Fascist Party that had helped him into power?
- sharing power with the King and the "Elite" who were still to powerful to ignore?
You need to evaluate Mussolinis position to next class (Tuesday 15/9). Write significance arguments and bring them to class.
The other paper was an evaluation of Mussolinis economic policies. To this paper you got the task to write "YES" and "NO" arguments. The question - "Were Mussolini's economic policies successful?" We will gather all the arguments next time and see how we can use them in a future essay.

IB3BD Tuesday 15/9: We went through the arguments for the first question - Was Mussolini:
- in sole control of Italy and its government?
- sharing power with the Fascist Party that had helped him into power?
- sharing power with the King and the "Elite" who were still to powerful to ignore?
We came to some arguments for "Yes" and some arguments for "No". Your homework to next week is to put evidence to the arguments we covered. This is a written assignment I want at the beginning of the next lesson!
We started to cover the fascist economy but it was not covered very well. I will provide you with some arguments for this questions during the next class...

IB3BG Friday 18/9: I handed out two "Exercise Papers" for the two questions you had as homework;
  1. To what extent was Mussolini the all powerful dictator of Italy 1922-1939?
  2. Were Mussolini's economic policies successful?
You were told to fill in the information for the first essay. Then you received three different "IB History Essay Marksheet". The first one was based on a "tradtional essay", the second on on a "Yes/No essay" and the third one on a "significance essay". You then had to choose the essay-type that you thought would be appropriate for the first question and fill it in. This was handed in to me before the end of the lesson. You get to fill in information for the second essay at home as well as choose essay-type and fill it in. This is your homework to the next lesson!

IB3BD Tuesday 22/9: You handed in todays homework (see above). Then I handed out two "Exercise Papers" for the two questions you had as homework;
  1. To what extent was Mussolini the all powerful dictator of Italy 1922-1939?
  2. Were Mussolini's economic policies successful?
You were told to fill in the information for the second essay (the first one you already had as homework). Attached to the "Exercise Paper" were three different "IB History Essay Marksheet". The first one was based on a "tradtional essay", the second on on a "Yes/No essay" and the third one on a "significance essay". You now had to choose the essay-type that you thought would be appropriate for the second question and fill it in. This was handed in to me at the end of the lesson.
At the very end of the lesson I handed out four different questions covering "Religion" (Andrea, Frida B and Renee), "Women" (Jacintha and Sofia), "Propaganda" (Danielle, Christian B, Amy and Dario) and "Youth" (Hannes, Hamza and Carl). With the help of the material I also handed out + Morris I want you to answer your question and hand them in in the beginning of the next lesson. Here are the questions:
  • Examine the role of religion in one single-party state
  • Examine the status of women in one single-party state
  • In what ways, and with what results, was propaganda used by one ruler of a single-party state?
  • Identify the aims of youth policies in one single-party state, and evaluate the extent to which they were achieved.
IB3BG Friday 27/9: We went through the paper that answered the question "Were Mussolini's economic policies successful?". At the end of the lesson I handed out four different questions covering "Religion" (George), "Women" (Camilla), "Propaganda" (Sulina) and "Youth" (Bryndis). With the help of the material I handed out + Morris I want you to answer your question and hand them in in the beginning of the next lesson. Here are the questions:
  • Examine the role of religion in one single-party state
  • Examine the status of women in one single-party state
  • In what ways, and with what results, was propaganda used by one ruler of a single-party state?
  • Identify the aims of youth policies in one single-party state, and evaluate the extent to which they were achieved.
IB3BD Tuesday 29/9: I had prepared the "Smartboard" for this lesson... When it "malfunctioned" the lesson became much less organized. You adjusted fairly well to this situation and gave an oral presentation of your specific topic:
"Propaganda" (Danielle, Christian B, Amy and Dario) - In what ways, and with what results, was propaganda used by one ruler of a single-party state?
"Youth" (Hannes, Hamza and Carl) - Identify the aims of youth policies in one single-party state, and evaluate the extent to which they were achieved.
"Women" (Jacintha and Sofia) - Examine the status of women in one single-party state
"Religion" (Andrea, Frida B and Renee) - Examine the role of religion in one single-party state
I was so scatter brained from the incidents of the Smartboard (that clearly outsmarted me) that I forgot to ask you to give me the written answer. Please do that in the beginning of the next HL lesson. At the end of the lesson I handed out a paper about "Foreign Policy". Read this to the next lesson - then we will go through this part together in class.

IB3BG Friday 2/10: We tried to use the Smartboard for presenting the answers to the following questions:
  • "Youth" - Identify the aims of youth policies in one single-party state, and evaluate the extent to which they were achieved (Bryndis)
  • "Propaganda" - In what ways, and with what results, was propaganda used by one ruler of a single-party state? (Sulina)
  • "Women" - Examine the status of women in one single-party state (Camilla)
  • "Religion" - Examine the role of religion in one single-party state (George)
The transition from handwritten text to typed text did not work as smoothly as I had hoped. This way of presenting took a lot of time. To be able to do faster presentation you will send me the text - typed - before the lesson or you will bring it on a memory stick (USB). When Bryndis was done I showed some previous presentation in PP (Power Point)... We have the "Religion" presentation left. You need to send me your written answers (the text that clearly answers the questions - not the presentation in class). At the end of the lesson I handed out a paper about "Foreign Policy". Read this to the next lesson - then we will go through this part together in class.

IB3BD Tuesday 6/10: I showed a PP (PowerPoint) I did about "Education and Youth" of Italy. Then we covered:
ITALY'S FOREIGN POLICY 1922-1939/1940
This was the last part of Mussolini and Italy 1922-1939/1940. The majority of the class decided to have an in-class-essay in two weeks - Week 43 (October 20th). You will get five (5) questions that covers Mussolini's way to power, the consolidation of power, Domestic politics including "Mussolinis position in Italy 1922-1939/40", Economic policies 1922-1939/40 and Foreign policy 1922-1939/40...

IB3BG Friday 9/10: Just to be on the safe side we started this lesson by using the traditional whiteboard:
  • "Religion" - Examine the role of religion in one single-party state (George)
George made a personal mindmap of this topic. After some explanations we covered the very last part of Mussolini and Italy 1922-1939:
ITALY'S FOREIGN POLICY 1922-1939/1940
You have decided that we will have an in-class-essay in one week - Week 42 (October 16th). You will get five (5) questions that covers Mussolini's way to power, the consolidation of power, Domestic politics including "Mussolinis position in Italy 1922-1939/40", Economic policies 1922-1939/40 and Foreign policy 1922-1939/40...

IB3BD Tuesday 13/10: I showed a PP (PowerPoint) with some photos from the Spanish Civil War. This marked the start of our new topic. I then handed out a paper that consisted of "Long-term Causes and Short-term Causes" of the Spanish Civil War, the "Non-Intervention Pact", the Spanish Civil War according to John Simkin (Spartacus Educational) and in the end a time-line of the Spanish Civil War. I Showed you Johns' page - here you have a link:
SPANISH CIVIL WAR (Spartacus Educational)
Your home work to the week after the Autumn vacation is to study the "CAUSES" of the Spanish Civil War. Use the papers you received and Spartacus.
NOTE - Next week - in-class-essay about Mussolini and Italy!

IB3BG Friday 16/10: ...

IB3BD Tuesday 20/10: IN-CLASS-ESSAY - "Italy and Mussolini"

IB3BG Friday 23/10: IN-CLASS-ESSAY - "Italy and Mussolini"

IB3BD Tuesday 3/11: I started this lesson by giving you the following old exam questions about the Spanish Civil War:
  1. In what ways, and to what extent, did foreign aid to both the Nationalists and the Republicans between 1936 and 1939 contribute to the outcome of the Spanish Civil War?
  2. What were the results of the Spanish Civil War for Spain and for Europe?
  3. Analyze the reasons for the Nationalist victory in the Spanish Civil War.
  4. Analyse the causes and results of the Spanish Civil War.
  5. Compare and contrast the impact of the Spanish Civil War on Spain and on one other European state between 1936 and 1939.
Your task is to make short outlines to each one of these questions - not more than one page for each question (what you would manage in 10 minutes...). To help you I gave out a paper about the Spanish Civil War (and you already have two other texts in the paper you received before the vacation). I will go through this part with you at the next lesson...

IB3BG Friday 6/11: I handed out two papers about the Spanish Civil War. The first one was ten pages from "Wolfson" that covers the background, causes, course and results - both from a Spanish and European perspective. The second one consisted of "Long-term Causes and Short-term Causes" of the Spanish Civil War, the "Non-Intervention Pact", the Spanish Civil War according to John Simkin (Spartacus Educational) and in the end a time-line of the Spanish Civil War. Here is a link to Johns homepage::
SPANISH CIVIL WAR (Spartacus Educational)
Your home work to next week is to study the "CAUSES" of the Spanish Civil War. Use the papers you received and Spartacus.

IB3BD Tuesday 10/11: We only covered the following two questions:
  1. Analyze the reasons for the Nationalist victory in the Spanish Civil War.
  2. Analyse the causes and results of the Spanish Civil War.
and part of:
  1. In what ways, and to what extent, did foreign aid to both the Nationalists and the Republicans between 1936 and 1939 contribute to the outcome of the Spanish Civil War?
There will be no HL class next week. To the week after - make sure you have done todays homework. We will then go through the other questions.

IB3BG Friday 13/11: I gave you a task at the beginning of this lesson - cover the four most important causes of the Spanish Civil War. You covered three/four causes and covered them with good arguments. Here are some of my "favorites";
  1. General poverty and industrial backwardness; There were huge differences between poor and rich - In 1900, 69% of the population were peasants. 65% of the population owned about 6.3% of the land, while 4% held 60%! Spain lacked industries - landless workers could not find any job in the cities. Spain was poor in raw materials, lacked a good communications network and lacked money for development... and in the end the affects of the Wall Street Crash and the World Depression...
  2. Weak monarchy - Alfonso XIII had experienced a military disaster in 1921 (Morocco) which nearly overthrew the monarchy. A coup 1923 (by Primo de Rivera) saved the king from a public inquiry. In 1930 he left the country and in 1931 he was told to not return. Spain became a Republic! The dominant groups in Spain were the Army, Church and the Nobility! Spain was very conservative - The Nobility was nearly feudal… the catholic Church supported the Spanish conservatism and so did the Army! The earlier governments had failed to reform the country.
  3. General decline and political instability - Spain had lost is position as a great imperial power (several wars; lost it’s South American colonies during the 19th century, war against Napoleon 1808-1813, against the Carlists 1833/34-1839, and 1875-1876, against the United States in 1898 - the Spanish-American War (Cuba, Puerto Rico and the Philippines) and against nationalists in Morocco 1921-1926)… At the same period (between 1808-1936) there were 109 governments. Between 1814 and 1923 there had been 43 military ”interventions”. A radical Spanish labor movement made the political instability even worse - Anarchism influenced by the French syndicalism (CNT - Confederatión Nacional de Trabajo) and the socialists (UGT - Unión General de Trabajadores) were influential. These unions especially attracted the landless laborers in Catalonia and Basque, the only real industrial areas of Spain.
  4. Regionalism - especially in the Basque region and in Catalonia.
  5. The establishment of the Second Republic 1931 - several reforms suggested the loss of wealth and privilege for the wealthy, the church and the army. Example: Agrarian Law 1932 allowed the distribution of all unworked estates over 56 acres to the peasantry; The church and the State was separated, the Jesuit order was expelled (and it’s assets expropriated), divorce was legalized etc.…; In the Army 40% of the officer corps was retired, republican officers were appointed and soldiers were now liable to civil law (not as before - only military law!). The progressive alliance of Republicans and Socialists were in power 1931 until 1933 when they were replaced by a more conservative government. CEDA (Confederatión Espanola de Derechas Autonomas). CEDA had been established as a reaction to the Republican policies - this was the united right. The governments between 1933 and February 1936 tried to slow down and erode the advances that been made the previous years. Though in February 1936 a new coalition of the left-wing parties won the elections…
  6. The political situation in 1936; This includes the victory of the left-wing parties February 1936 - The Popular Front (dominated by the Socialist Party) had won a majority in the Cortes. It was a close election 34.3% for the Popular Front and 33.2% for the Right. These numbers encouraged the army leaders to act. The government seemed to be unable to preserve order when riots and violence broke out during the spring and summer of 1936. It also includes the spread of disorder and instability - 251 churches were burnt, 324 newspaper offices, political clubs and priests houses were attacked (79 being totally destroyed), 339 people murdered and 331 strikes occurred. In the south landless peasants seized land…and in the end the murder of Calvo Sotelo in July 1936. Sotelo was a right-wing politician (the head of CEDA). Sotelos assassination was actually a reprisal from the left-wing for two of their men. Though Solelos death had more impact. It could be compared to the assassination in 1914 in Sarajevo...
We will not have any HL class on Friday next week (20/11). The week after we will continue with the Spanish Civil War in class...

IB3BD Tuesday 24/11 & IB3BG Friday 27/11: I decided to change the program a bit. Therefore we covered causes of the Spanish Civil War today. After some problems In IB3BD (big ones) I showed a documentary about the period 1931-1936. I asked the class to please take notes of the different causes mentioned. Here you have the URL:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wS-KLhoenmI&feature=PlayList&p=87949CAB2CD90318&index=1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3IQAE2WHIRw&feature=PlayList&p=87949CAB2CD90318&index=2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PcKJV7fnTvU&feature=PlayList&p=87949CAB2CD90318&index=3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQMc6ZtRuMo&feature=PlayList&p=87949CAB2CD90318&index=4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sb-naVQdg7I&feature=PlayList&p=87949CAB2CD90318&index=5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibXUp8GLWlo&feature=PlayList&p=87949CAB2CD90318&index=6
To this you should add:
  1. General poverty and industrial backwardness; There were huge differences between poor and rich - In 1900, 69% of the population were peasants. 65% of the population owned about 6.3% of the land, while 4% held 60%! Spain lacked industries - landless workers could not find any job in the cities. Spain was poor in raw materials, lacked a good communications network and lacked money for development... and in the end the affects of the Wall Street Crash and the World Depression...
  2. Weak monarchy - Alfonso XIII had experienced a military disaster in 1921 (Morocco) which nearly overthrew the monarchy. A coup 1923 (by Primo de Rivera) saved the king from a public inquiry. In 1930 he left the country and in 1931 he was told to not return. Spain became a Republic! The dominant groups in Spain were the Army, Church and the Nobility! Spain was very conservative - The Nobility was nearly feudal… the catholic Church supported the Spanish conservatism and so did the Army! The earlier governments had failed to reform the country.
  3. General decline and political instability - Spain had lost is position as a great imperial power (several wars; lost it’s South American colonies during the 19th century, war against Napoleon 1808-1813, against the Carlists 1833/34-1839, and 1875-1876, against the United States in 1898 - the Spanish-American War (Cuba, Puerto Rico and the Philippines) and against nationalists in Morocco 1921-1926)… At the same period (between 1808-1936) there were 109 governments. Between 1814 and 1923 there had been 43 military ”interventions”. A radical Spanish labor movement made the political instability even worse - Anarchism influenced by the French syndicalism (CNT - Confederatión Nacional de Trabajo) and the socialists (UGT - Unión General de Trabajadores) were influential. These unions especially attracted the landless laborers in Catalonia and Basque, the only real industrial areas of Spain.
  4. Regionalism - especially in the Basque region and in Catalonia.
  5. The establishment of the Second Republic 1931 - several reforms suggested the loss of wealth and privilege for the wealthy, the church and the army. Example: Agrarian Law 1932 allowed the distribution of all unworked estates over 56 acres to the peasantry; The church and the State was separated, the Jesuit order was expelled (and it’s assets expropriated), divorce was legalized etc.…; In the Army 40% of the officer corps was retired, republican officers were appointed and soldiers were now liable to civil law (not as before - only military law!). The progressive alliance of Republicans and Socialists were in power 1931 until 1933 when they were replaced by a more conservative government. CEDA (Confederatión Espanola de Derechas Autonomas). CEDA had been established as a reaction to the Republican policies - this was the united right. The governments between 1933 and February 1936 tried to slow down and erode the advances that been made the previous years. Though in February 1936 a new coalition of the left-wing parties won the elections…
  6. The political situation in 1936; This includes the victory of the left-wing parties February 1936 - The Popular Front (dominated by the Socialist Party) had won a majority in the Cortes. It was a close election 34.3% for the Popular Front and 33.2% for the Right. These numbers encouraged the army leaders to act. The government seemed to be unable to preserve order when riots and violence broke out during the spring and summer of 1936. It also includes the spread of disorder and instability - 251 churches were burnt, 324 newspaper offices, political clubs and priests houses were attacked (79 being totally destroyed), 339 people murdered and 331 strikes occurred. In the south landless peasants seized land…and in the end the murder of Calvo Sotelo in July 1936. Sotelo was a right-wing politician (the head of CEDA). Sotelos assassination was actually a reprisal from the left-wing for two of their men. Though Solelos death had more impact. It could be compared to the assassination in 1914 in Sarajevo...
In IB3BG I started by handing out the list of "CAUSES" above. Then we looked at the documentary. For both classes - We will go through your notes at the beginning of the next lesson. make sure you are familiar with all the causes of the Spanish Civil War. After that we will cover the course. Here is a Flash presentation of the "COURSE"...

IB3BD Tuesday 1/12: At the start of this lesson I wrote the following things on the whiteboard:

  • Battle of Badajos
  • Battle of Majorca
  • Battle of Cape Espartel
  • Siege of Madrid
  • Battle of Málaga
  • Battle of Jarama
  • Battle of Guadaljara
  • Bombing of Guernica
  • Battle of Brunete
  • Battle of Santander
  • Battle of Belchite
  • Battle of El Masuco
  • Battle of Teruel
  • Battle of Cape Palos
  • Battle of the Ebro
I divided the class into five different groups. Then you got to work on these events of the Spanish Civil War. You first needed to note "When" and "Where" the event took place (map please). Then you needed to write the "Results" of the event. The answers should be sent to "macgregorishistory@gmail.com" latest Sunday evening (7/12 - IB3BD). We will go through this at the beginning of the next lesson - after we cover the "Causes" (I totally forgot to check your homework - sorry).

IB3BG Friday 4/12: At the start of this lesson I handed out the following list:
  • Battle of Badajos
  • Battle of Majorca
  • Battle of Cape Espartel
  • Siege of Madrid
  • Battle of Málaga
  • Battle of Jarama
  • Battle of Guadaljara
  • Bombing of Guernica
  • Battle of Brunete
  • Battle of Santander
  • Battle of Belchite
  • Battle of El Masuco
  • Battle of Teruel
  • Battle of Cape Palos
  • Battle of the Ebro
I split the battles between you four students. Then you got to work on these events of the Spanish Civil War. You first needed to note "When" and "Where" the event took place (map please). Then you needed to write the "Results" of the event. The answers should be sent to "macgregorishistory@gmail.com" latest next week - Friday (11/12). We will go through this at the beginning of the next lesson - after we cover the "Causes"...

IB3BD Tuesday 8/12: After some delayes we started to go through the different battles. We covered:
  • Battle of Badajos
  • Battle of Majorca
  • Battle of Cape Espartel
  • Siege of Madrid
  • Battle of Málaga
  • Battle of Jarama
  • Battle of Guadaljara
  • Bombing of Guernica
  • Battle of Brunete
  • Battle of Santander
  • Battle of Belchite
  • Battle of El Masuco
  • Battle of Teruel
We will cover the two last battles next time:
  • Battle of Cape Palos
  • Battle of the Ebro
...and maybe get to see a PP presentation about some previous battles. Your homework is to find some reasons to the Nationalist victory and the Republican defeat...

IB3BG Friday 11/12: Cancelled...
  • Battle of Badajos
  • Battle of Majorca
  • Battle of Cape Espartel
  • Siege of Madrid
  • Battle of Málaga
  • Battle of Jarama
  • Battle of Guadaljara
  • Bombing of Guernica
  • Battle of Brunete
  • Battle of Santander
  • Battle of Belchite
  • Battle of El Masuco
  • Battle of Teruel
  • Battle of Cape Palos
  • Battle of the Ebro
I split the battles between you four students. You got to work on these events of the Spanish Civil War. You first needed to note "When" and "Where" the event took place (map please). Then you needed to write the "Results" of the event. The answers should have be sent to "macgregorishistory@gmail.com" latest today - Friday (11/12). I have not received any...
We will go through this at the beginning of the next lesson - after we cover the "Causes"...

IB3BD Tuesday 15/12: We covered the two last battles:
  • Battle of Cape Palos
  • Battle of the Ebro
Since we are a bit before the other group we ended the lesson after these presentations. Therefore you have the homework as before: Your homework is to find some reasons to the Nationalist victory and the Republican defeat...

IB3BG Friday 8/1: These were the areas we should have covered today:
  • Battle of Badajos
  • Battle of Majorca
  • Battle of Cape Espartel
  • Siege of Madrid
  • Battle of Málaga
  • Battle of Jarama
  • Battle of Guadaljara
  • Bombing of Guernica
  • Battle of Brunete
  • Battle of Santander
  • Battle of Belchite
  • Battle of El Masuco
  • Battle of Teruel
  • Battle of Cape Palos
  • Battle of the Ebro
We did not cover any of them. Why? Because 50% of the work was not done! So instead I showed part of a film about the Spanish Civil War. During our next class the 50% missing has to be done!

IB3BD Tuesday 12/1: We covered the reasons for the Nationalist victory and the results of the Spanish Civil War for Spain and the rest of the world...

Reasons for the Nationalist victory

1. Nationalists received greater foreign assistance

a. German and Italian help was crucial - especially important was the prompt German and Italian airlift in 1936. Hitler provided the Condor Legion of 6000 men and 100 planes; Mussolini provided 50.000 troops, as well as 760 aircraft and 950 tanks; President Salazar of Portugal provided 20.000 troops and the use of Portuguese roads...
b. The British and French governments a policy of non-­ intervention - the Nyon Conference in 1937 resulted in threats against the German and Italian interference, but it came to late...
c. British, French and US businessmen supported the Nationalists, as did conservatives in general - They were bitter on the cuts on business made by the Popular Front. Franco guaranteed the continuation of private enterprises in Spain. Especially important for the Nationalists were the continuation of oil deliveries; 1/4 came from Texaco and 1/4 came from Shell...
d. Limited support from Soviet was not enough for the Republicans - the supply line from Soviet was long; Stalin did not want to push the Western democracies into Fascist hands by encouraging fear of communism; Stalin demanded prompt payment in gold; after the Munich Conference 1938 (September) Soviet stopped their aid...
e. International Brigades of volunteers helped both sides - 100.000 fought for the Nationalists (mostly Italians, Portuguese and Germans...) and about 40.000 fought for the Republicans (about 3000 came from the US and about 5000 from the USSR).
f. Pope Pius supported Franco - Franco was a "bastion against Godless socialism"

2. The Nationalist forces were superior in all ways

a. Franco was very capable - Franco was able to unite the opposition. He was also a very skillful military...
b. The Republicans were very disunited - divided especially between Anarchists, Socialists, Marxists, Stalinists, Communists, Trotskyists, Republicans and Liberals. On the Republican side there was a virtual civil war within the Civil War...
c. The Nationalists numbered about 600.000 men against 450.000 Republicans - Only 500 out of 15.000 officers were Republicans...

Results for Spain
  1. General Franco came into power - General Franco and his conservative party came into power 1939. They would remain in power until Franco´s death 1975
  2. There was great death and destruction - 70.000 died at the Nationalist side and about 100.000 died on the Republican side. After the war was over a "White terror" set in which killed between 40.000-200.000. About 200.000 civilians were also killed (often put at 1 million)...
  3. Many Republicans had to spend years in concentration camps -
  4. Between 10 and 15% of the nation's wealth was destroyed - 1/3 of the Spanish merchant marine was put out of action...
  5. Reconstruction was difficult - when Spain tried to get loans (credits) it was refused by Britain , France and Germany!
  6. Second World War eased the situation - France and Britain made trade arrangements with Spain...
  7. There was a legacy of great bitterness - this often split families
  8. It meant end of reforms and progress - the wealthy and the Church got their privileges restored...
General results
  1. Reduced confidence in Communism – both in Spain and in Europe. USSR gave support to the Republican side (limited support) - this side was defeated!
  2. The war helped to bring the end of the League of Nations – League of Nations once again proved itself ineffective. The Nyon Conference was an initiative made by Britain and France not the League of Nations.
  3. Many military lessons, especially for Germany – The Germans got to test bullet-resistant fuel tanks, they learnt valuable lessons about the techniques of Blitzkrieg, they realized the need of radio contact between tanks and they got to exercise air strikes. These lessons contributed greatly to German success in 1939-1940.
  4. Soviet-German relations deteriorated – at least for a while. However, the Civil War was also one reason for the Soviet-German pacts of 1939!
  5. It discouraged Stalin from making an alliance with the West - If France would not try to prevent Fascist encirclement, then Stalin could expect no or little help against Hitler. The West had shown itself weak!
  6. It made it easier for Hitler and Germany to expand into Austria and Czechoslovakia (and it generally encouraged Hitler) - It preoccupied Britain, France and Italy. The Anglo-French inaction convinced Hitler that Britain and France would not act against him. The British non-intervention policy in Spain was intended to preserve peace. It had the opposite effect as it encouraged Hitler's expansion in Europe...
  7. It prevented an alliance of Britain + France with Mussolini - The Italian involvement in Spain cemented the ties between Germany and Italy (before 1935 they had several serious arguments). This strengthened Hitler's position.
  8. It encouraged the Anglo-French policy of appeasement - the bombing of towns and the general suffering of civilians reinforced the view that war was impossible because the bomber would always get through. This was one of Chamberlain's arguments for appeasement policy. The clashes between German forces and Soviet also gave some credence to Hitler's claim to be defending the world against communism...
  9. The Spanish Civil War contributed to bringing about the Second World War - most historians argue that the Spanish Civil War was the prelude to the Second World War. Though A.J.P. Taylor, a famous revisionist, has a different opinion (in his classic book - The Origins of the Second World War) - he argues that the Spanish Civil War was "without significant effect in causing the Second World War". He also criticizes the Anglo-French appeasement policy "British and French policy, or lack of it, not the policy of Hitler and Mussolini, decided the outcome of the Spanish civil war. The republic had greater recourses, greater popular backing. It could win if it received the correct treatment to which it was entitled by international law: foreign arms for the legitimate government, none for the rebels. It could even win if both sides received foreign aid, or if both were denied it".
  10. The fighting produced a literary and artistic outburst – Ernest Hemingway, Arthur Koestler, George Orwell, Pablo Picasso...
This finished the Spanish Civil War! Now it's just to write an in-class-essay about it...

IB3BG Friday 15/1: This is what we did cover today:
  • Battle of Badajos
  • Battle of Majorca
  • Battle of Cape Espartel
  • Siege of Madrid
  • Battle of Málaga
  • Battle of Jarama
  • Battle of Guadaljara
  • Bombing of Guernica
  • Battle of Brunete
  • Battle of Santander
  • Battle of Belchite
  • Battle of El Masuco
  • Battle of Teruel
  • Battle of Cape Palos
  • Battle of the Ebro
We will talk about the results of the Spanish Civil War next week...

IB3BD Tuesday 19/1: I thought we were going to have an in-class-essay today... - I was wrong! So what happened then?
We talked a bit about the different exam papers and what each one of them contained according to the Syllabus. Then we went through some causes of the Spanish Civil War:
  • Political Causes – long-term: Weak monarchy, ruling aristocracy + military, strong Catholic Church who dominated education
  • Political Causes – short-term: 1931-1936: 1931 – Republic and liberal leftist government (coalition) – many reform attempts / 1933 – Rightist government (coalition) – tried to undo all the radical reforms and delay other ones / 1936 – Popular Front (leftist coalition) – many new reforms – tension…
  • Social Causes – huge differences between different classes. Few land-owning very rich Aristocrats and many very poor peasants (1900: 4% - 69%)
  • Economic Causes – Poor agriculture economy (backward) – small poorly developed industry (mostly in Catalonia and Basque). Unequal distribution of wealth.
  • Regionalism – Catalonia and Basque wanted independency (at least self-rule). This is where you find the industries, the more radical parties and less repression.
  • Religious Causes – The Catholic Church was very dominant and they completely cooperated with the Aristocracy (and the militaries). They feared the new leftist movements (especially socialism) and felt their existence threatened – that’s why the Spanish Church full heartedly supported the nationalists…
That was it! Next week we will have an in-class-essay!

IB3BG Friday 22/1: I started by handing out exactly the same text as I given you once before - about the Spanish Civil War. We looked briefly on the first pages which covered "A Background: Spain 1923-31", "B Republican Spain 1931-6", "C The outbreak of the war" and "D The course of the war". Then we covered the results of the Spanish Civil War;
  1. Franco and the Nationalists won because of their greater unity and superior supplies
  2. The Church was an especially powerful ally to the Nationalists
  3. The Republicans' supporters were divided into a number of disparate groups (Anarchists, Communists, Socialists, Republicans, etc...)
  4. Franco's forces received more aid from Germany and Italy (men, military equipment, food and raw materials) than the Republicans got from either Russia or international groups
  5. Powerful private companies like the American Texas Oil Company also supported the Nationalists
  6. Franco and his colleagues + officers were far more experienced in matters of tactics and supply than the "People's Army"
The rest of the lesson we spent looking at some parts of the war that also played a crucial role:
  • The Conservative government of Great Britain - they did not support the leftist government in Spain and therefore put pressure on France to do the same. At the same time they did not support the Nationalists either - they instead came up with the idea of "non-intervention"!
  • The policy of non-intervention played a crucial role since it actively hindered the participating countries from sending equipment and men to Republican Spain (27 nations were represented on the Non-Intervention Committee in London)
  • Even though both Italy and Germany also sat at the Non-Intervention Committee they gave aid to Franco and the Nationalists - first in secret - later in the open.
  • Hitler wanted raw material (like minerals) and Göring wanted to test his military forces (a special squadron known as the "Condor Legion" was formed and sent to Spain - they were very important for the Nationalists)
  • Italy sent a big amount of "volunteers" (between 50 000 - 75 000 men) as well as material. Mussolini did not get any real advantage of the war except some Italian victories to satisfy him and the glory of Italy
  • At a conference in Nyon (September 1937) the Western Mediterranean was divided into separate patrol zones that were supervised by the "non-intervention" countries (including Italy). This hit the Republican side hard since both Germany and Italy continued to support the Nationalists
  • Great Britain did not want to confront Mussolini and Italy too much since they still hoped that they could keep him away from Hitler and Germany (appeasement)
  • Russia did not want to ruin their image too much so they never sent an extensive amount of material, very few men and they pulled out of the war before it was over
  • May Days in Barcelona were a period of civil violence in Catalonia, between May 3 and May 8, 1937, when factions on the Republican side of the Spanish Civil War engaged each other in street battles in the city of Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain). It was the result of the deeper division between Anarchists and Communists which had persisted for decades - a civil war within the Civil War!!!
That was it. I handed out another paper about the Spanish Civil War (look above under IB3BD - Tuesday 12/1). On Friday next week we will have an in-class-essay about the Spanish Civil War!

IB3BD Wednesday 27/1: In-class-Essay!!! Our HL-lessons will be on Mondays! Questions:
  1. Analyze the strength and weakness of the opposing sides in the Spanish Civil War.
  2. Analyze the causes and results of the Spanish Civil War.
  3. Why did a Civil War break out in Spain in 1936?
  4. To what extent did the foreign aid contribute to the Nationalist victory?
  5. Explain why Franco's forces won the Spanish Civil War, and why the Republican forces lost.
IB3BG Friday 29/1: In-class-Essay!!! Questions:
  1. Analyze the strength and weakness of the opposing sides in the Spanish Civil War.
  2. Analyze the causes and results of the Spanish Civil War.
  3. Why did a Civil War break out in Spain in 1936?
  4. To what extent did the foreign aid contribute to the Nationalist victory?
  5. Explain why Franco's forces won the Spanish Civil War, and why the Republican forces lost.
IB3BD Monday 1/2: During this lesson we started a new topic - Russia 1855-1894. To be able to understand what was going on in Russia during this period it's important to start with the previous Tsar - Nicholas I:
Tsar Nicholas I 1825-1855
An autocratic reign - Why?
Reaction on the Decembrist Revolt of 1825: The Decembrist revolt was one early attempt to change the old Russian autocratic system. It was some Russian officers who at December 26th, 1825, tried to take advantage of the confusion following the death of Alexander I. The Decembrist conspirators were of liberal inclination, and their background was Russian freemasonry and the Russian army. The Masonic lodges, where men were treated as equals irrespective of their official rank, in effect were semi-secret societies where those of similar views could meet and make plans. Although Alexander I banned all freemasonry, it was too late to prevent some of the masons forming new and completely secret societies with revolutionary aims. Prominent among those who realized that drastic changes were needed were Russian army men, especially those who had been in the army of occupation in France. They had observed conditions in France, where there were no serfs, where there was relative freedom of speech and of the press, where there were regular judicial processes, where there was a constitution of sorts, and where new ideas circulated and were openly discussed. The Decembrists failed because they were divided among themselves, had made no real preparations for their revolt, refused to make use of discontent among the masses, and were mentally prepared in advance for a glorious failure. Another reason was the fact that the leaders of the revolt didn't show up...

His personal revulsion against the spread of radical ideas in Europe (increased with the deposition of Charles X by the French in 1830, by the Polish revolt of 1831 (A strong reaction against the attempt to westernize Poland) and by the uprisings all over Europe in 1848).

Support from the Orthodox Church. Throughout the 19th century the Orthodox Church, with its message of faith in God and unquestioning submission to God’s will, was the major support of the Tsarist regime. The Tsar also held the position as titular ”Head of the Church
The Russian "Constitution of 1832" - Collected Laws of the Russian Empire”. According to the "Constitution" (not a real Constitution);
  • The Tsar made all final decisions to Russia’s government, army, economy and foreign relations. The other bodies of government were just administrative or advisory
  • The three bodies of administration and advice’s were;
  • The Imperial Council (or His Imperial Majesty’s Private Chancery. The Third Section of this Chancery was in charge of state security, standing at the centre of a complex web of censorship and surveillance)
  • The Committee of Ministers (8 )
  • The Senate
A Paternal system.The Tsar is a father. His subjects are his children, and children ought never to reason about their parents.” This opinion is also a reason why the government so strictly was in the hands of the Tsar.
Nationality - slavophiles. A conviction that Russian social organization, religion, government, culture and philosophy were superior of the system of western Europe; ”slavophiles” against ”westernizers”. Russia and the Tsar also saw it as a duty to protect the Slavs against all external threats. The effect of Western liberalism and nationalism which resulted in the Polish revolt 1831 is an example of this. It was ruthlessly suppressed and resulted in the abolition of many important elements of Polish national identity. The Polish constitution was withdrawn, the universities closed and the Russian language was more vigorously imposed in Polish public life. During the 19th century Russia also saw itself as the protector of the Slavs and the Orthodox Christians in the declining Ottoman Empire. This view would lead to problems…
The Serfdom. Even though Tsar Nicholas I recognized serfdom as ”in its present situation in our country is an evil, palpable and obvious to all, but to attack it now would be something still more harmful.” (1842). The serfdom supported the autocratic system, not only because the state owned 19 millions ”state peasants”, but also because of the allegiance of the serf to the landowner. This was combined with the allegiance of the landowner to the Tsar to constitute the whole political hierarchy upon which the stability of Russia seemed to depend.
Lack of industrial development. This prevented the development of an urban middle class, or of an urban work force. This preserved the rigid system of serfdom.

Foreign policy of Tsar Nicholas I.
EUROPE :
Russo-Turkish war 1828-29. Russia espoused the cause of the Greek revolutionists to form an independent state. A Russian fleet joined the British and French vessels which destroyed the Turkish fleet in the battle of Navarino (1827). In the resulting Russo-Turkish War of 1828-29, Turkey was defeated. The treaty of Adrianople gave Russia suverainty over the tribes of the Caucasus, and gave the emperor a protectorate over Moldavia and Wallachia with accompanying rights of interference in their domestic affairs as the protector of Christians living under Turkish rule. Russia also achieved free passage for its ships on the Danube River and through the Straits of Bosporia. After this war Russia became a friend of Turkey, for Nicholas did not wish to see the fall of a long established dynasty in Constantinople.

The Polish Revolt of 1830-31 was a mixture of international influence (from France especially), Polish nationalism and an attempt to introduce western more liberal ideas. The Revolt was crushed and the Polish constitution was abrogated, it became more and more ruled by St. Petersburg bureaucrats, its universities were closed, and the Russian language was imposed in official institutions.

Russo-Turkish agreement. In 1833 Russia acquired virtual control of the Dardanelles by agreement with Turkey. This agreement was the Sultans way of showing gratitude since Russia had aided Turkey by sending its Black Sea fleet against Egyptian rebellions.

Wallachia 1848 (Rumania). In 1848 there was another revolution in Paris which led to upheavals all over Europe. Tsar Nicholas I now became known as the ”gendarme of Europe”. He warned the revolutionaries ”Give heed, O ye peoples, and submit, for God is with us!” Russian troops helped the Turks suppress a revolutionary government that had formed in Wallachia under the impression of the events in western Europe.

Hungary 1849. Nicholas I also send in the Russian army to enable the Emperor of Austria to suppress a revolt of Hungarian revolutionaries in 1849. Hungarian nationalists demanded a formation of a Hungarian ministry. This ministry was put into office and it then severed practically all ties with Austria. Extreme Magyar nationalism, expressed in part by a decree making Hungarian the official language of the State, rapidly alienated the Slavic section of the population. In May 1849 the Austrian emperor Francis Joseph succeeded in arranging a military alliance with Tsar Nicholas I. Austria and Russia ”won” but the Russian army lost 10,000 men in this campaign (9000 died from disease…).

...and then came the Crimean War! This is where we will start next time. You have the following pages in Morris as homework: 40-54

IB3BG Friday 5/2: NO CLASS! Back problems (lumbago)

IB3BD Monday 8/2: We continued with Russia. Today I went through the domestic policies of Alexander II (1855-1881). The Crimean War made it necessary to carry through some reforms:
Continued autocracy or liberal reforms and changes under Tsar Alexander II…
Emancipation of the serfs. The institution of serfdom recognized the ownership of one man, woman or family by another, and involved the total subjection of the serf to the will of his or her owner. In 1858, 31 per cent of Russia’s population of 74 million, that is some 22.5 million persons, were serfs. In addition over 19 million were ”state peasants”, tied to lands owned by the crown. The authority of their owners, sometimes delegated to the elders of the peasant commune (the mir), was almost absolute.
Nicholas I legislation did away with some of the most inhuman aspects of the institution, forbidding the splitting up of families by the sale of individuals (1833), and banning the auctioning of serfs (1841).
By the Edict of Emancipation of 1861, Tsar Alexander II ended the system of serfs. The Edict freed them from serfdom and provided them with some land (usually to small). This land was initially paid for by the State (in government bonds), and the peasants then had to repay the debt. The landlords rarely hesitated to compensate themselves for the loss of free serf labor by inflating the estimated value of the land. The ”mir” became responsible to the state for collecting the redemption dues (regularly payments over 49 years) as well as the taxes. To ensure that peasants would not escape their debts, the mir issued passports and until 1903 no peasant could leave his village without a passport and the consent of the mir. The peasants could not sell or mortgage the land to anybody outside his local mir. Instead of being a serf under a landlord he was now a serf under the mir!
Impact of emancipation:
Some historians said it had a great impact, (Hugh Seton-Watson - compares it with the less peaceful and less successful emancipation in USA) others said it was a ”fraud” (Lionel Kochan). Morris claims that it would be more correct to talk about ”that serfdom was abolished rather than that the serfs had been emancipated.” He gives four reasons for this;
1.
The process was slow, dictated by the needs of the individual landowner.
2.
The settlement made upon the ex-serfs was usually unsatisfactory. The serf got to little and the landowner saw to it that he got as much as possible.
3.
Many peasants resented the redemption payments of property that they thought belong to them from the very beginning.
4.
As mentioned, the serf was freed from the landowner but became a serf under the mir. In the shorter run, emancipation did not seem to solve the twin problems of rural unrest and industrial backwardness.

New local governments - Zemstvos. One consequence of the emancipation was the need to replace the local government, consisting of serf-owning landlords before 1861. Alexander II did this in 1864 when he approved the reform of setting up ”zemstvos” - local Parliaments, elected by an electoral collage system that gave most votes to the richest citizens. The members of each zemstvo were to be responsible for transport, health, education, the poor, famine relief, and the encouragement of agriculture and industry in their area. Zemstvos only existed in European Russia. In 1870 similar assemblies were formed in the urban districts - town councils. These local assemblies could have been a step away from the old autocracy, but the system of voting and their established local reputations made it easy for the conservative nobility to dominate. At provincial level they occupied 74 per cent of all zemstvo seats in 1865-67. When suggestions came up to form a central, national body with delegates from different zemstvos the Tsar ”sharply reminded them of the limitations upon their powers”. Seton-Watson claims that this was where Alexander stood at the crossroads between autocracy and liberal reforms. Having whetted the appetite for the latter, he remained committed to the former (maybe with the exception of his last year…).

Reforms of the legal system. From 1865 a new legal system replaced the old ”summary justice of the landlord.” It made the legal proceedings public, included all the classes of society, introduced a common jury system and saw to it that judges were independent of the government. Seton-Watson claims that these were remarkable reforms, ensuring that ”the court room was the one place in Russia where real freedom of speech prevailed.”

Military reforms. The disasters of the Crimean war made apparent the need of changes within the military system. The minister of war, Dmitri Milyutin, got this responsibility. Florinsky and other Russian historians has ”hailed” this man for being one of the few outstanding statesmen of imperial Russia . Milyutin
1. Reduced the term of service from 25 years (”life sentence”) to a period of six years.
2. He introduced universal military service (1874) to which all males were liable at 20 years of age (no loopholes for the rich and the nobility).
3. He abolished the more brutal form of military punishment and military service as a punishment for criminal offenses.
4 He also took away the ”military colonies” an institution where the sons of long-term service men were sent to be trained as the next generation of soldiers.

Educational reforms. The numbers of university students were allowed to rise again in 1855. European government (1857) and philosophy (1860) was permitted once more. A new University Statute (1863) gave the universities more autonomy in their own affairs.

Those were the reforms... Still, it's also under this period the domestic criticism is getting louder;

The Tsar was criticized from both sides - the conservatives resented the loss of influence and privilege and the liberals became frustrated at the Tsar´s refusal to take his reforms to their logical conclusion. More radical and revolutionary forms of opposition developed as Alexander’s reign progressed. In some ways the reforms created this ”hot” political atmosphere.

The most important names on the Russian left in the 1850s and the 1860s were those of Alexander Herzen (exiled in 1848. Published a journal ”The Bell” (Kolokol) from London ), Nikolai Chernyshevsky (part of then literary radicalism of the 1850s. He claimed that reforms were impossible without a fundamental alteration of Russia ’s political and economical bases. His novel ”What is to be Done?” inspired the next generation) and D. I. Pisarev (he advised his followers to not ”accept any single principle on trust, however much respect surrounds that principle”. This principle to accept nothing of the existing society without question was named ”nihilism” (nihil (lat.) - nothing)).

Populism was a movement that dominated Russian radicalism in the mid 1870s. The basic idea was to re-educate the Russian peasantry. In 1874-75 3,000 young radicals invaded the countryside to open the eyes of the population to their plight and show them the sources of salvation This movement ”To the People” was a depressing failure. Over 1,600 of these populists (narodniki) were arrested between 1873-77, often handed over to the police by the peasants! A breakaway group calling itself ”Land and Liberty” (Zemlya i Volya) made some progress in the following years. Members of ”Land and Liberty” also founded the first unions for Russian industrial workers in Odessa (1875) and in St. Petersburg (1878).

Terrorism was the more attractive alternative for those with less patience. The first attempt on the life of the Tsar was in 1866 when a student shot at him in the streets of St. Petersburg . In 1879 a split in the ranks of ”Land and Liberty” gave birth to a group called ”The Peoples Will” (Narodnaya Volya) that advocated violence as the trigger to general revolution. Although other government officials were among their early victims, their chief target was always the Tsar himself. Attempts to shoot him, dynamite the royal train and explosives in the Winter Palace came within a year 1879-80. In March 1881 they succeeded!

We will cover Alexander II's last years after the vacation as well as his foreign policy, but to be well prepared for the Mock Exams you can also read it here:
ALEXANDER II
Good Luck on the Mock Exams. Don't forget the IA's...

IB3BG Friday 12/2: During this lesson we started a new topic - Russia 1855-1894. To be able to understand what was going on in Russia during this period it's important to start with the previous Tsar - Nicholas I:
Tsar Nicholas I 1825-1855
An autocratic reign - Why?
Reaction on the Decembrist Revolt of 1825: The Decembrist revolt was one early attempt to change the old Russian autocratic system. It was some Russian officers who at December 26th, 1825, tried to take advantage of the confusion following the death of Alexander I. The Decembrist conspirators were of liberal inclination, and their background was Russian freemasonry and the Russian army. The Masonic lodges, where men were treated as equals irrespective of their official rank, in effect were semi-secret societies where those of similar views could meet and make plans. Although Alexander I banned all freemasonry, it was too late to prevent some of the masons forming new and completely secret societies with revolutionary aims. Prominent among those who realized that drastic changes were needed were Russian army men, especially those who had been in the army of occupation in France. They had observed conditions in France, where there were no serfs, where there was relative freedom of speech and of the press, where there were regular judicial processes, where there was a constitution of sorts, and where new ideas circulated and were openly discussed. The Decembrists failed because they were divided among themselves, had made no real preparations for their revolt, refused to make use of discontent among the masses, and were mentally prepared in advance for a glorious failure. Another reason was the fact that the leaders of the revolt didn't show up...

His personal revulsion against the spread of radical ideas in Europe (increased with the deposition of Charles X by the French in 1830, by the Polish revolt of 1831 (A strong reaction against the attempt to westernize Poland) and by the uprisings all over Europe in 1848).

Support from the Orthodox Church. Throughout the 19th century the Orthodox Church, with its message of faith in God and unquestioning submission to God’s will, was the major support of the Tsarist regime. The Tsar also held the position as titular ”Head of the Church
The Russian "Constitution of 1832" - Collected Laws of the Russian Empire”. According to the "Constitution" (not a real Constitution);
  • The Tsar made all final decisions to Russia’s government, army, economy and foreign relations. The other bodies of government were just administrative or advisory
  • The three bodies of administration and advice’s were;
  • The Imperial Council (or His Imperial Majesty’s Private Chancery. The Third Section of this Chancery was in charge of state security, standing at the centre of a complex web of censorship and surveillance)
  • The Committee of Ministers (8 )
  • The Senate
A Paternal system.The Tsar is a father. His subjects are his children, and children ought never to reason about their parents.” This opinion is also a reason why the government so strictly was in the hands of the Tsar.
Nationality - slavophiles. A conviction that Russian social organization, religion, government, culture and philosophy were superior of the system of western Europe; ”slavophiles” against ”westernizers”. Russia and the Tsar also saw it as a duty to protect the Slavs against all external threats. The effect of Western liberalism and nationalism which resulted in the Polish revolt 1831 is an example of this. It was ruthlessly suppressed and resulted in the abolition of many important elements of Polish national identity. The Polish constitution was withdrawn, the universities closed and the Russian language was more vigorously imposed in Polish public life. During the 19th century Russia also saw itself as the protector of the Slavs and the Orthodox Christians in the declining Ottoman Empire. This view would lead to problems…
The Serfdom. Even though Tsar Nicholas I recognized serfdom as ”in its present situation in our country is an evil, palpable and obvious to all, but to attack it now would be something still more harmful.” (1842). The serfdom supported the autocratic system, not only because the state owned 19 millions ”state peasants”, but also because of the allegiance of the serf to the landowner. This was combined with the allegiance of the landowner to the Tsar to constitute the whole political hierarchy upon which the stability of Russia seemed to depend.
Lack of industrial development. This prevented the development of an urban middle class, or of an urban work force. This preserved the rigid system of serfdom.

Foreign policy of Tsar Nicholas I.
EUROPE :
Russo-Turkish war 1828-29. Russia espoused the cause of the Greek revolutionists to form an independent state. A Russian fleet joined the British and French vessels which destroyed the Turkish fleet in the battle of Navarino (1827). In the resulting Russo-Turkish War of 1828-29, Turkey was defeated. The treaty of Adrianople gave Russia suverainty over the tribes of the Caucasus, and gave the emperor a protectorate over Moldavia and Wallachia with accompanying rights of interference in their domestic affairs as the protector of Christians living under Turkish rule. Russia also achieved free passage for its ships on the Danube River and through the Straits of Bosporia. After this war Russia became a friend of Turkey, for Nicholas did not wish to see the fall of a long established dynasty in Constantinople.

The Polish Revolt of 1830-31 was a mixture of international influence (from France especially), Polish nationalism and an attempt to introduce western more liberal ideas. The Revolt was crushed and the Polish constitution was abrogated, it became more and more ruled by St. Petersburg bureaucrats, its universities were closed, and the Russian language was imposed in official institutions.

Russo-Turkish agreement. In 1833 Russia acquired virtual control of the Dardanelles by agreement with Turkey. This agreement was the Sultans way of showing gratitude since Russia had aided Turkey by sending its Black Sea fleet against Egyptian rebellions.

Wallachia 1848 (Rumania). In 1848 there was another revolution in Paris which led to upheavals all over Europe. Tsar Nicholas I now became known as the ”gendarme of Europe”. He warned the revolutionaries ”Give heed, O ye peoples, and submit, for God is with us!” Russian troops helped the Turks suppress a revolutionary government that had formed in Wallachia under the impression of the events in western Europe.

Hungary 1849. Nicholas I also send in the Russian army to enable the Emperor of Austria to suppress a revolt of Hungarian revolutionaries in 1849. Hungarian nationalists demanded a formation of a Hungarian ministry. This ministry was put into office and it then severed practically all ties with Austria. Extreme Magyar nationalism, expressed in part by a decree making Hungarian the official language of the State, rapidly alienated the Slavic section of the population. In May 1849 the Austrian emperor Francis Joseph succeeded in arranging a military alliance with Tsar Nicholas I. Austria and Russia ”won” but the Russian army lost 10,000 men in this campaign (9000 died from disease…).

...and then came the Crimean War! Try to study Alexander II all by yourself to the Mock Exams. Here is a link to some material:

ALEXANDER II

We will go through Alexander II and Alexander III in class after the Mock Exams. Good Luck on the Mock Exams. Don't forget the IA's...

IB3BG Friday 5/3: We continued with Russia. Today I went through the domestic policies of Alexander II (1855-1881). The Crimean War made it necessary to carry through some reforms:
Continued autocracy or liberal reforms and changes under Tsar Alexander II…
Emancipation of the serfs. The institution of serfdom recognized the ownership of one man, woman or family by another, and involved the total subjection of the serf to the will of his or her owner. In 1858, 31 per cent of Russia’s population of 74 million, that is some 22.5 million persons, were serfs. In addition over 19 million were ”state peasants”, tied to lands owned by the crown. The authority of their owners, sometimes delegated to the elders of the peasant commune (the mir), was almost absolute.
Nicholas I legislation did away with some of the most inhuman aspects of the institution, forbidding the splitting up of families by the sale of individuals (1833), and banning the auctioning of serfs (1841).
By the Edict of Emancipation of 1861, Tsar Alexander II ended the system of serfs. The Edict freed them from serfdom and provided them with some land (usually to small). This land was initially paid for by the State (in government bonds), and the peasants then had to repay the debt. The landlords rarely hesitated to compensate themselves for the loss of free serf labor by inflating the estimated value of the land. The ”mir” became responsible to the state for collecting the redemption dues (regularly payments over 49 years) as well as the taxes. To ensure that peasants would not escape their debts, the mir issued passports and until 1903 no peasant could leave his village without a passport and the consent of the mir. The peasants could not sell or mortgage the land to anybody outside his local mir. Instead of being a serf under a landlord he was now a serf under the mir!
Impact of emancipation:
Some historians said it had a great impact, (Hugh Seton-Watson - compares it with the less peaceful and less successful emancipation in USA) others said it was a ”fraud” (Lionel Kochan). Morris claims that it would be more correct to talk about ”that serfdom was abolished rather than that the serfs had been emancipated.” He gives four reasons for this;
1.
The process was slow, dictated by the needs of the individual landowner.
2.
The settlement made upon the ex-serfs was usually unsatisfactory. The serf got to little and the landowner saw to it that he got as much as possible.
3.
Many peasants resented the redemption payments of property that they thought belong to them from the very beginning.
4.
As mentioned, the serf was freed from the landowner but became a serf under the mir. In the shorter run, emancipation did not seem to solve the twin problems of rural unrest and industrial backwardness.

New local governments - Zemstvos. One consequence of the emancipation was the need to replace the local government, consisting of serf-owning landlords before 1861. Alexander II did this in 1864 when he approved the reform of setting up ”zemstvos” - local Parliaments, elected by an electoral collage system that gave most votes to the richest citizens. The members of each zemstvo were to be responsible for transport, health, education, the poor, famine relief, and the encouragement of agriculture and industry in their area. Zemstvos only existed in European Russia. In 1870 similar assemblies were formed in the urban districts - town councils. These local assemblies could have been a step away from the old autocracy, but the system of voting and their established local reputations made it easy for the conservative nobility to dominate. At provincial level they occupied 74 per cent of all zemstvo seats in 1865-67. When suggestions came up to form a central, national body with delegates from different zemstvos the Tsar ”sharply reminded them of the limitations upon their powers”. Seton-Watson claims that this was where Alexander stood at the crossroads between autocracy and liberal reforms. Having whetted the appetite for the latter, he remained committed to the former (maybe with the exception of his last year…).

Reforms of the legal system. From 1865 a new legal system replaced the old ”summary justice of the landlord.” It made the legal proceedings public, included all the classes of society, introduced a common jury system and saw to it that judges were independent of the government. Seton-Watson claims that these were remarkable reforms, ensuring that ”the court room was the one place in Russia where real freedom of speech prevailed.”

Military reforms. The disasters of the Crimean war made apparent the need of changes within the military system. The minister of war, Dmitri Milyutin, got this responsibility. Florinsky and other Russian historians has ”hailed” this man for being one of the few outstanding statesmen of imperial Russia . Milyutin
1. Reduced the term of service from 25 years (”life sentence”) to a period of six years.
2. He introduced universal military service (1874) to which all males were liable at 20 years of age (no loopholes for the rich and the nobility).
3. He abolished the more brutal form of military punishment and military service as a punishment for criminal offenses.
4 He also took away the ”military colonies” an institution where the sons of long-term service men were sent to be trained as the next generation of soldiers.

Educational reforms. The numbers of university students were allowed to rise again in 1855. European government (1857) and philosophy (1860) was permitted once more. A new University Statute (1863) gave the universities more autonomy in their own affairs.

Those were the reforms... Still, it's also under this period the domestic criticism is getting louder;

The Tsar was criticized from both sides - the conservatives resented the loss of influence and privilege and the liberals became frustrated at the Tsar´s refusal to take his reforms to their logical conclusion. More radical and revolutionary forms of opposition developed as Alexander’s reign progressed. In some ways the reforms created this ”hot” political atmosphere.

The most important names on the Russian left in the 1850s and the 1860s were those of Alexander Herzen (exiled in 1848. Published a journal ”The Bell” (Kolokol) from London ), Nikolai Chernyshevsky (part of then literary radicalism of the 1850s. He claimed that reforms were impossible without a fundamental alteration of Russia ’s political and economical bases. His novel ”What is to be Done?” inspired the next generation) and D. I. Pisarev (he advised his followers to not ”accept any single principle on trust, however much respect surrounds that principle”. This principle to accept nothing of the existing society without question was named ”nihilism” (nihil (lat.) - nothing)).

Populism was a movement that dominated Russian radicalism in the mid 1870s. The basic idea was to re-educate the Russian peasantry. In 1874-75 3,000 young radicals invaded the countryside to open the eyes of the population to their plight and show them the sources of salvation This movement ”To the People” was a depressing failure. Over 1,600 of these populists (narodniki) were arrested between 1873-77, often handed over to the police by the peasants! A breakaway group calling itself ”Land and Liberty” (Zemlya i Volya) made some progress in the following years. Members of ”Land and Liberty” also founded the first unions for Russian industrial workers in Odessa (1875) and in St. Petersburg (1878).

Terrorism was the more attractive alternative for those with less patience. The first attempt on the life of the Tsar was in 1866 when a student shot at him in the streets of St. Petersburg . In 1879 a split in the ranks of ”Land and Liberty” gave birth to a group called ”The Peoples Will” (Narodnaya Volya) that advocated violence as the trigger to general revolution. Although other government officials were among their early victims, their chief target was always the Tsar himself. Attempts to shoot him, dynamite the royal train and explosives in the Winter Palace came within a year 1879-80. In March 1881 they succeeded!

We will cover Alexander II's last years next week. At the end of the lesson I handed out your "Spanish Civil War" essays...

IB3BD Monday 8/3: We went through "Mock Exam" - Paper 3. The results from some students were good. After looking at the scores we looked at the questions and had some guesses what this paper might be like in May... but remember that part is just speculations. The best thing you can do is to always read the Syllabus. There you have exact information about what's coming up in May. Here is a link to Paper 3 (and Paper 1 and 2) in the Syllabus;
PAPER 3

We will continue to cover Russia next week so please prepare by doind some homework...

IB3BG Friday 12/3: We went through "Mock Exam" - Paper 3. The results from some students were OK. After looking at the scores we looked at the questions and went through some of them. If you can't find your Syllabus - here is a link:
PAPER 3
At the end of the lesson we went through the last years of Alexander II;

Alexander II:s last year - a liberal attempt? Alexander had during the latter part of his reign showed that he remained committed to an autocratic system, though there was maybe an attempt to go back to a more liberal system during his last years… When Alexander’s first wife died in 1880, he married the much younger Princess Dolgoruky. She was the friend and patron of a number of liberal politicians. It was under this period a liberal politician; Mikhail Loris-Melikov was appointed minister of the interior. He managed to abolish the Third Section (as described before, the Third Section was a part of the Imperial Council or His Imperial Majesty’s Private Chancery, and this section was in charge of state security). Loris-Melikov also managed to replace one of the most reactionary ministers - Dmitri Tolstoy (Ministry of Education). Right before Alexander II was killed he had just given his personal approval for calling in a national assembly, partly of nominated members, but also elected representatives of the zemstvos and the town councils. The Soviet historian P. A. Zaionchkovsky concedes that ”in the conditions of an increasingly complex situation it might have been the beginning of the establishment of a parliamentary system in Russia”. This came to a stop when Alexander was killed by the second of two bombs thrown at his sledge in a St Petersburg street.

We will cover Alexander III and the Foreign Policy of Alexander II and Alexander III during the next lesson. Please read Morris pages 60-69...

IB3BD Monday 15/3: I started this lesson with handing out "old essays" - the Spanish Civil War. After that I handed out a mindmap of Nicholas I. We went through it together... When we came to the end of this - the Crimean War - I told the class that this might come on your exams - especially the results of the Crimean War. So we went through the main results of the Crimean War together;
A.J.P Taylor supports the view of the military incompetence. The Crimean War "destroyed the myth and the reality of Russian military power.” The Crimean War had a big impact in Europe except the changed view of Russia’s military capacity;
  • It was the end of the ”Congress System” that had existed since Vienna 1815. No major war had occurred between 1815-1854
  • It weakened the two traditional guarantors of the status quo in Europe; Austria and Russia. Britain, although a victor in the Crimean War, eventually lost her continental role after the poor handling of the Italian unification, the Polish uprise (1863) and the Schleswig-Holstein dispute 1864
  • It cut the link between Austria and Russia
  • The balance of power in Central Europe was destroyed
  • The change of balance gave a unique opportunity to a new generation of statesmen with revisionist aims; Napoleon III (France), Cavour (Piedmont-Sardinia) and Bismarck (Prussia)
  • Two countries were unified; Italy (1861) and Germany (1871). The formation of Germany definitely ruined the balance of power in Central Europe
  • Short wars with specific objectives became favorable
  • The eastern question became a constant irritant inflaming relation between Austria-Hungary and Russia
This was where we ended. Next lesson (in two weeks) we will cover both Alexander II and Alexander III. Please read Morris pages 48 to 69...

IB3BG Friday 19/3: We covered Alexander III - all except his foreign policies:
ALEXANDER III (1881-1894)
”Autocracy, Orthodoxy and Russification”
Background: Influenced by his Tutor (and later his Advisor) Konstantin Pobedonostsev who was very reactionary:
  • True believer in Autocracy
  • Against Democracy
  • Orthodox (Procurator of the Holy Synod = lay supervisor of the Orthodox Church)
  • Against all other religions and sects
  • Anti-Semite: “One third of the Jews should be killed, one third should be forced to emigrate and one third should be assimilated
  • Russian! Against all minorities of Russia …
Restrictions against the Zemstvo/Dumas (local administrations) and the courts
  • Land Commandants – a new office introduced by Alexander III in 1889
  • Land Commandants had to belong to the nobility
  • Land Commandants sat in the local administration (Zemstvo/Dumas) and had senior administrative and judicial power – over-riding the authority of the local administration
  • Land Commandants replaced the Office of Justice of the Peace in local courts
More restrictions of the local administrations - Laws 1890 and 1892
  • Restricted the popular vote to the Zemstvo/Dumas
  • A list of candidates to the local administration replaced the previous ability to freely vote for Zemstvo/Duma deputies
  • The suggestions and proposals from the local administrations were often obstructed and undermined
Restrictions against Elementary and Higher Education
  • The influence of the local clergy (Orthodox Church) in elementary schools expanded a lot during the reign of Alexander III – In 1897 over 79% of the population was illiterate
  • 1884 – Law that limited the administrative autonomy of Higher Education
  • 1887 – Tuition fees were raised
Other signs of “REACTION”
Russification. This now included areas that had relative autonomy - therefore they had been loyal to the Tsar: Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Armenia… The attempts of Russification did not lead to more obedience – rather the opposite; resistance and cries for total independence!
EX: Finland
  • 1899 – The Finnish Diet was deprived of nearly all their legislative rights – protests…
  • 1903 – The Russian Governor-General Nikolai Bobrikov was given dictatorial power so he could crush the opposition
  • 1904 – Bobrikov was assassinated – this could have lead to repression but…
  • 1904-05 – Russo-Japanese War / Bloody Sunday / 1905 Revolt / Manifestos…
  • 1905 – Finland temporarily got the old constitution back
Anti-Semitism. Why – Jews had participated in the Polish Rebellion 1863 and one of the assassinators of Alexander II was Jewish (Hessia Helfmann). Methods:
  • Ghettos for Jews were created in urban areas
  • 1881-1905 – over 215 cases of “pogroms” (= persecution of Jews)
  • Jews were forbidden to make any new settlements in rural areas
  • Jews were not allowed to trade on Christian holidays
  • Special quotas for Jews in schools and higher education
  • Kiev 1886 – all “illegal” Jews were expelled from the city
  • Moscow 1891 – all “illegal” Jews were expelled from the city
REACTION: Several Jews emigrated. Other joined the Zionist movement or became revolutionaries. In 1897 “Bund” was founded (part of the Socialist Movement in Russia and also part of the Russian Social Democratic Party which was founded the year after – 1898)
More signs of “REACTION”
  • The liberal Minister of Interior Loris-Melikov was replaced by Nikolai Ignatiev who later was replaced by Dmitry Tolstoy…
  • Lenin’s brother Alexander was executed in 1886 accused of plotting to kill the Tsar
  • Supervision of Universities and Courts
  • Censorship and supervision of the Press
ECONOMY
Industrialization…
  • Development of railroads – linked major areas of industrial development to important markets + linked the areas of agricultural production with the ports of the Black Sea
  • 1883 – the Batum–Baku railroad. Linked the Caspian Sea with the Black Sea. This increased the Russian oil production a lot!
  • 1891 – Start of the construction of the Trans-Siberian railroad
Tariffs:
  • In the 1870’s low tariffs
  • Late 1870’s – tariffs began to rise
  • 1891 – the “Great Protective Tariffs”. These tariffs especially protected the Russian coal and pig iron production
Sergei Witte became Minister of Finance 1892
  • More protective tariffs
  • Foreign investments and foreign capital in Russian industries
  • Russian currency put on the Gold Standard
W.O. Henderson (Economic Historian) – “The Russian economy was still backward in some respects, it was also true that vigorous state action, foreign capital and foreign machinery had given Russia a powerful impetus on the road to industrialization
Lenin (1899) – “If we compare the present rapidity of development with that which could be achieved with the modern level of technique and culture, the present rate of development of capitalism in Russia really must be considered slow
November 1st 1894 – Alexander III died! His son Nicholas II took over at the age of 26. His first comment when he heard his father was dead was: “What am I to do? I am not prepared to be Tsar. I know nothing of the business of ruling”.
This was all for today! Next week we will do the very last part of Russia - the foreign policies between 1855-1894...

IB3BG Friday 26/3: We covered Alexander II and Alexander III's foreign policies:

Foreign policy of Tsar Alexander II.

Crimean War – Treaty of Paris 1856. Russia lost the war against an alliance of the Ottoman Empire, Great Britain, France and Piedmont (Kingdom of Sardinia). The Habsburg Empire (Austria-Hungary) had supported the alliance but they never participated actively in the war. The Alliance now wanted to give certain protection to the Ottoman Empire against Russian aggression:

  • Moldavia and Wallachia would remain under the Ottoman Empire (but they would be granted independent constitutions and national assemblies). Moldavia would also receive southern Bessarabia (Budjak) from Russia .
  • A referendum would be held at a later date in Moldavia and Wallachia to decide an eventual unification (future Rumania …)
  • Russia lost some territories at the mouth of the Danube
  • Åland Islands should remain demilitarized (these islands belonged to Finland – the Russian “Grand Duchy of Finland” – and Russia had built a fortress (Bomarsund) which was destroyed by British and French forces in 1854)
  • Russia had to abandon its claims to protect the Christians of the Ottoman Empire in favor of France
  • The Black Sea should become “neutral territory”. This closed the Black Sea to all warships, prohibited all fortifications and any presence of armaments on its shores (the “Black Sea clauses”)

REACTION:

  • Russian economy was bad – and so was the political climate. To ease the economy and calm the population of Russia Alexander II decided to reform – he started with the Emancipation of the Serfs (1861)
  • Russia changed the foreign policy – new focus on Asia
  • Previous friendship and understanding between Russia and the Habsburg Empire (Austria-Hungary) was now gone. This isolated both nations…
  • Russia tried to break its isolation (and break the alliance) by befriending France

Russia-France 1856-1863. Russia wanted to break its isolation and therefore turned to France. This is the reason why Russia;

  • accepted the formation of a semi-independent Rumania 1858 (Paris Conference) even though Russia still had a big interest in the Balkans
  • accepted Napoleon III’s plan of war against the Habsburg Empire (Austria-Hungary) 1859. This Alexander II did without hesitation since it broke the previous alliance and the Habsburg Empire (Austria-Hungary) now got “punished” for deserting Russia 1855

…but when France supported the Poles 1863 (Polish Revolt) Russia broke their attempts to befriend France!

Polish Revolt 1863. In 1861 a demonstration in Warsaw for greater Polish independence against the previous Russification ended in the Russian military open fire. Over 200 demonstrators were killed… Nicholas I’s brother Konstantin was given the authority as viceroy – he was nearly assassinated after only one month in office. When a rumor of the conscription of Poles to the Russian Army spread a revolt broke out in January 1863. It took the Russian militaries nearly a year to crush it.

RESULT: Russification…

  • Property of the Polish Roman Catholic Church was seized
  • University of Warsaw was closed
  • Russian language now became the official administrative language
  • More Russians and less Poles were put into the Polish administration
  • Isolation again!!! France had openly supported the independence of Poland. Great Britain and the Habsburg Empire also supported the Poles – but not openly.

Alexander II now concentrated on his domestic affairs – Reforms!!!

Russia-Prussia 1863-1878. During this period Russia was befriended by Prussia/Germany with its new Chancellor Otto von Bismarck. This is the reason why Russia;

  • stayed neutral during the Seven Weeks War (Prusso-Austrian War) 1866
  • stayed neutral during the Franco-Prussian War 1870-71 (Russia renounced the Black Sea clauses 1870 – in November. At the Great Power Conference in London 1871 both Russia and the Ottoman Empire were given the formal permission to station naval forces on the Black Sea)
  • Germany was now a strong power in the centre of Europe. Bismarck’s diplomacy paid off!
  • 1873 – Dreikaiserbund (Germany, Austria-Hungary and Russia) It consisted of a series of bi--lateral military agreements promising aid to any party attacked by a fourth power. Behind the facade Russia resented the rising German power and at Austrian pretensions in the Balkans.

Asia – continued expansion. Nicholas I had incorporated new areas in the south and east of the Russian Empire. Alexander II continued this policy by:

  • Renewed campaigns in Caucasus 1857. Brought to a successful conclusion in 1864 when the population negative to Russian expansion had been killed or forced over the borders…
  • Russian troops continued with successful campaigns towards Persia and Afghanistan
  • In Central Asia three Khanates (Khiva, Khokand and Bukhara) were incorporated
  • China was persuaded to cede territory north of the Amur River and some area north of Korea – Russia founded a naval base there – they named it Vladivostok
  • Russia established trading rights with Japan and started to negotiate the acquisition of the island of Sakhalin

Alaska sold. Close relations existed between the USA and Russia. The few Russians living in Alaska had seen a declining number of otters, the main animal in the fur trade, so the business was not good anymore. Alaska was also at the very edge of the Empire making it hard to control and Russia desperately needed money. That’s why Russia sold Alaska 1867 to the USA for $7 million. The US Congress nearly refused the deal since they thought the price was far too high…

Balkans – the Eastern Question. Russia never lost interest in the Balkan area. They were forced to be diplomatic and careful in their Balkan policy. Pan-Slavism was strong in Russia so the popular demand of expansion into the Balkans was always there. During the first 20 years of his reign Alexander II managed to control the popular demand. In 1875 a major crisis in the area, especially in Bosnia, Herzegovina and later in Bulgaria escalated into open revolts and demands of independence. The Ottoman Empire tried to brutally crush these revolts. In May 1876 Russia, Germany and Austria-Hungary agreed on a solution (Berlin Memorandum) but the action in support of the rebels fell because Great Britain opposed it. In June 1876 Serbia and Montenegro declared war against the Ottoman Empire. Thousands of Russian volunteers joined the Serbian Army. The war went bad and Alexander II now had to take a decision of Russian active involvement or not…

The Russo-Turkish War 1877-1878: Russia made an agreement with Austria (Reichstadt July 1876) whereby Russia would regain southern Bessarabia, lost in 1856, and Austria would receive part of Bosnia and Herzegovina in the event of a successful Russian clash with Turkey. The war started in April 1877. Both Turkey and Russia suffered from military incompetence - L. Kochan describes it as ”a war between the one-eyed and the blind - so many errors of strategy and judgment were committed”. Nevertheless, Russia was the less incompetent and won this war.

  • Treaty of Stefano (3 March 1878). Russia enjoyed considerable gains. Russia gained territory in Caucasus and regained the southern part of Bessarabia. Ignoring the agreement of Reichstadt Russia helped the creation of Rumania, Serbia, Montenegro and a large Bulgarian state (all open for Russian influence). The diplomatic protests and hostilities forced Russia to a revision of the treaty. Both Austria-Hungary and Great Britain made it clear that it had to be revised. Alexander II and Russia accepted for three main reasons:
    • The war had strained the weak Russian economy
    • Russia had problems defeating the Ottoman Empire. She would not be able to stand up against an alliance of the Great Powers of Europe
    • The pressure from domestic problems and threats of revolt was big
  • Congress of Berlin (June-July 1878). Russia and Tsar Alexander II saw the Congress of Berlin as ”a European coalition against Russia under the leadership of Prince Bismarck”. Russia maintained her gains in Asia but the Balkan settlements were rearranged. The Russians felt that they had won the war but lost the diplomatic negotiations. Both the Balkan nationalists and the Russian Pan-Slavists felt a lingering resentment toward Austria-Hungary, Great Britain and Germany for depriving them of the fruits of the Russian military victory. Russia recovered control of the mouth of the Danube, received areas in Asia which were rich of oil and the creation of Bulgaria was a significant gain of influence. If the treaty would have been compared with the situation in 1876 it would have been a good treaty, but it was not. It was instead compared to the treaty of San Stefano…
  • The Dreikaiserbund was also undermined by the installation of Austrian administration in Bosnia and Herzegovina against the local population’s will.
  • The tension between Germany and Russia escalated even more the next year when Germany introduced protective tariffs against Russian agriculture.
  • Dual Alliance 1879. Germany wanted to make sure that they had an ally so they signed a specific alliance with Austria-Hungary . Russia was now a weak link.
  • Then in 1881 Alexander was assassinated!

Foreign policy of Tsar Alexander III.

Three Emperor’s League 1881. A weakened version of the Dreikaiserbund was established at the beginning of Alexander III’s reign (June 1881). The dual goals of the league were to prevent intervention by Austria-Hungary or Russia in the event of an outbreak of hostilities between France and Germany and to prevent friction between Austria-Hungary and Russia over territorial claims in the Balkans. The Three Emperor’s League was renewed in 1884 but it was not renewed when it expired in 1887. Instead, Russia moved closer diplomatically to France.

France again - the French ”entente”: In 1887 Alexander III refused to renew the Three Emperor’s League (in 1881 the Drekaiserbund changed name). This threatened Bismarck’s diplomatic policies. He managed to receive a bilateral, completely secret agreement with Russia, known as the Reinsurance Treaty 1887.

The refusal of the new German Kaiser Wilhelm II to renew the treaty in 1890 renewed Russia’s international isolation. An agreement to curtail the activities of Russian nihilists in France was followed by the more important step of opening the French money market to Russian borrowing. Slowly, between 1891 and 1894, the military understanding all important to France began to take shape. Meetings between the respective chiefs of staff resulted in an agreement on joint military action. The Tsar finally consented to regard this as the basis of an official Franco-Russian alliance (January 1894). Russia undertook to attack Germany if that country attacked France, or aided Italy in an attack on France. France was similarly committed if Germany attacked Russia, or aided Austria-Hungary in such an attack. This took Europe a step closer to the outbreak of World War I.

THE END!!! We are done with the Higher Level Course. Next time we will revise the Unification of Germany, the Unification of Italy and start with the coming of Mussolini... Please bring your material.

IB3BD Monday 29/3: We covered Alexander III - and the foreign policies of Alexander II & III
ALEXANDER III (1881-1894)
”Autocracy, Orthodoxy and Russification”
Background: Influenced by his Tutor (and later his Advisor) Konstantin Pobedonostsev who was very reactionary:
  • True believer in Autocracy
  • Against Democracy
  • Orthodox (Procurator of the Holy Synod = lay supervisor of the Orthodox Church)
  • Against all other religions and sects
  • Anti-Semite: “One third of the Jews should be killed, one third should be forced to emigrate and one third should be assimilated
  • Russian! Against all minorities of Russia …
Restrictions against the Zemstvo/Dumas (local administrations) and the courts
  • Land Commandants – a new office introduced by Alexander III in 1889
  • Land Commandants had to belong to the nobility
  • Land Commandants sat in the local administration (Zemstvo/Dumas) and had senior administrative and judicial power – over-riding the authority of the local administration
  • Land Commandants replaced the Office of Justice of the Peace in local courts
More restrictions of the local administrations - Laws 1890 and 1892
  • Restricted the popular vote to the Zemstvo/Dumas
  • A list of candidates to the local administration replaced the previous ability to freely vote for Zemstvo/Duma deputies
  • The suggestions and proposals from the local administrations were often obstructed and undermined
Restrictions against Elementary and Higher Education
  • The influence of the local clergy (Orthodox Church) in elementary schools expanded a lot during the reign of Alexander III – In 1897 over 79% of the population was illiterate
  • 1884 – Law that limited the administrative autonomy of Higher Education
  • 1887 – Tuition fees were raised
Other signs of “REACTION”
Russification. This now included areas that had relative autonomy - therefore they had been loyal to the Tsar: Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Armenia… The attempts of Russification did not lead to more obedience – rather the opposite; resistance and cries for total independence!
EX: Finland
  • 1899 – The Finnish Diet was deprived of nearly all their legislative rights – protests…
  • 1903 – The Russian Governor-General Nikolai Bobrikov was given dictatorial power so he could crush the opposition
  • 1904 – Bobrikov was assassinated – this could have lead to repression but…
  • 1904-05 – Russo-Japanese War / Bloody Sunday / 1905 Revolt / Manifestos…
  • 1905 – Finland temporarily got the old constitution back
Anti-Semitism. Why – Jews had participated in the Polish Rebellion 1863 and one of the assassinators of Alexander II was Jewish (Hessia Helfmann). Methods:
  • Ghettos for Jews were created in urban areas
  • 1881-1905 – over 215 cases of “pogroms” (= persecution of Jews)
  • Jews were forbidden to make any new settlements in rural areas
  • Jews were not allowed to trade on Christian holidays
  • Special quotas for Jews in schools and higher education
  • Kiev 1886 – all “illegal” Jews were expelled from the city
  • Moscow 1891 – all “illegal” Jews were expelled from the city
REACTION: Several Jews emigrated. Other joined the Zionist movement or became revolutionaries. In 1897 “Bund” was founded (part of the Socialist Movement in Russia and also part of the Russian Social Democratic Party which was founded the year after – 1898)
More signs of “REACTION”
  • The liberal Minister of Interior Loris-Melikov was replaced by Nikolai Ignatiev who later was replaced by Dmitry Tolstoy…
  • Lenin’s brother Alexander was executed in 1886 accused of plotting to kill the Tsar
  • Supervision of Universities and Courts
  • Censorship and supervision of the Press
ECONOMY
Industrialization…
  • Development of railroads – linked major areas of industrial development to important markets + linked the areas of agricultural production with the ports of the Black Sea
  • 1883 – the Batum–Baku railroad. Linked the Caspian Sea with the Black Sea. This increased the Russian oil production a lot!
  • 1891 – Start of the construction of the Trans-Siberian railroad
Tariffs:
  • In the 1870’s low tariffs
  • Late 1870’s – tariffs began to rise
  • 1891 – the “Great Protective Tariffs”. These tariffs especially protected the Russian coal and pig iron production
Sergei Witte became Minister of Finance 1892
  • More protective tariffs
  • Foreign investments and foreign capital in Russian industries
  • Russian currency put on the Gold Standard
W.O. Henderson (Economic Historian) – “The Russian economy was still backward in some respects, it was also true that vigorous state action, foreign capital and foreign machinery had given Russia a powerful impetus on the road to industrialization
Lenin (1899) – “If we compare the present rapidity of development with that which could be achieved with the modern level of technique and culture, the present rate of development of capitalism in Russia really must be considered slow
November 1st 1894 – Alexander III died! His son Nicholas II took over at the age of 26. His first comment when he heard his father was dead was: “What am I to do? I am not prepared to be Tsar. I know nothing of the business of ruling”.

Foreign policy of Tsar Alexander II.

Crimean War – Treaty of Paris 1856. Russia lost the war against an alliance of the Ottoman Empire, Great Britain, France and Piedmont (Kingdom of Sardinia). The Habsburg Empire (Austria-Hungary) had supported the alliance but they never participated actively in the war. The Alliance now wanted to give certain protection to the Ottoman Empire against Russian aggression:

  • Moldavia and Wallachia would remain under the Ottoman Empire (but they would be granted independent constitutions and national assemblies). Moldavia would also receive southern Bessarabia (Budjak) from Russia .
  • A referendum would be held at a later date in Moldavia and Wallachia to decide an eventual unification (future Rumania …)
  • Russia lost some territories at the mouth of the Danube
  • Åland Islands should remain demilitarized (these islands belonged to Finland – the Russian “Grand Duchy of Finland” – and Russia had built a fortress (Bomarsund) which was destroyed by British and French forces in 1854)
  • Russia had to abandon its claims to protect the Christians of the Ottoman Empire in favor of France
  • The Black Sea should become “neutral territory”. This closed the Black Sea to all warships, prohibited all fortifications and any presence of armaments on its shores (the “Black Sea clauses”)

REACTION:

  • Russian economy was bad – and so was the political climate. To ease the economy and calm the population of Russia Alexander II decided to reform – he started with the Emancipation of the Serfs (1861)
  • Russia changed the foreign policy – new focus on Asia
  • Previous friendship and understanding between Russia and the Habsburg Empire (Austria-Hungary) was now gone. This isolated both nations…
  • Russia tried to break its isolation (and break the alliance) by befriending France

Russia-France 1856-1863. Russia wanted to break its isolation and therefore turned to France. This is the reason why Russia;

  • accepted the formation of a semi-independent Rumania 1858 (Paris Conference) even though Russia still had a big interest in the Balkans
  • accepted Napoleon III’s plan of war against the Habsburg Empire (Austria-Hungary) 1859. This Alexander II did without hesitation since it broke the previous alliance and the Habsburg Empire (Austria-Hungary) now got “punished” for deserting Russia 1855

…but when France supported the Poles 1863 (Polish Revolt) Russia broke their attempts to befriend France!

Polish Revolt 1863. In 1861 a demonstration in Warsaw for greater Polish independence against the previous Russification ended in the Russian military open fire. Over 200 demonstrators were killed… Nicholas I’s brother Konstantin was given the authority as viceroy – he was nearly assassinated after only one month in office. When a rumor of the conscription of Poles to the Russian Army spread a revolt broke out in January 1863. It took the Russian militaries nearly a year to crush it.

RESULT: Russification…

  • Property of the Polish Roman Catholic Church was seized
  • University of Warsaw was closed
  • Russian language now became the official administrative language
  • More Russians and less Poles were put into the Polish administration
  • Isolation again!!! France had openly supported the independence of Poland. Great Britain and the Habsburg Empire also supported the Poles – but not openly.

Alexander II now concentrated on his domestic affairs – Reforms!!!

Russia-Prussia 1863-1878. During this period Russia was befriended by Prussia/Germany with its new Chancellor Otto von Bismarck. This is the reason why Russia;

  • stayed neutral during the Seven Weeks War (Prusso-Austrian War) 1866
  • stayed neutral during the Franco-Prussian War 1870-71 (Russia renounced the Black Sea clauses 1870 – in November. At the Great Power Conference in London 1871 both Russia and the Ottoman Empire were given the formal permission to station naval forces on the Black Sea)
  • Germany was now a strong power in the centre of Europe. Bismarck’s diplomacy paid off!
  • 1873 – Dreikaiserbund (Germany, Austria-Hungary and Russia) It consisted of a series of bi--lateral military agreements promising aid to any party attacked by a fourth power. Behind the facade Russia resented the rising German power and at Austrian pretensions in the Balkans.

Asia – continued expansion. Nicholas I had incorporated new areas in the south and east of the Russian Empire. Alexander II continued this policy by:

  • Renewed campaigns in Caucasus 1857. Brought to a successful conclusion in 1864 when the population negative to Russian expansion had been killed or forced over the borders…
  • Russian troops continued with successful campaigns towards Persia and Afghanistan
  • In Central Asia three Khanates (Khiva, Khokand and Bukhara) were incorporated
  • China was persuaded to cede territory north of the Amur River and some area north of Korea – Russia founded a naval base there – they named it Vladivostok
  • Russia established trading rights with Japan and started to negotiate the acquisition of the island of Sakhalin

Alaska sold. Close relations existed between the USA and Russia. The few Russians living in Alaska had seen a declining number of otters, the main animal in the fur trade, so the business was not good anymore. Alaska was also at the very edge of the Empire making it hard to control and Russia desperately needed money. That’s why Russia sold Alaska 1867 to the USA for $7 million. The US Congress nearly refused the deal since they thought the price was far too high…

Balkans – the Eastern Question. Russia never lost interest in the Balkan area. They were forced to be diplomatic and careful in their Balkan policy. Pan-Slavism was strong in Russia so the popular demand of expansion into the Balkans was always there. During the first 20 years of his reign Alexander II managed to control the popular demand. In 1875 a major crisis in the area, especially in Bosnia, Herzegovina and later in Bulgaria escalated into open revolts and demands of independence. The Ottoman Empire tried to brutally crush these revolts. In May 1876 Russia, Germany and Austria-Hungary agreed on a solution (Berlin Memorandum) but the action in support of the rebels fell because Great Britain opposed it. In June 1876 Serbia and Montenegro declared war against the Ottoman Empire. Thousands of Russian volunteers joined the Serbian Army. The war went bad and Alexander II now had to take a decision of Russian active involvement or not…

The Russo-Turkish War 1877-1878: Russia made an agreement with Austria (Reichstadt July 1876) whereby Russia would regain southern Bessarabia, lost in 1856, and Austria would receive part of Bosnia and Herzegovina in the event of a successful Russian clash with Turkey. The war started in April 1877. Both Turkey and Russia suffered from military incompetence - L. Kochan describes it as ”a war between the one-eyed and the blind - so many errors of strategy and judgment were committed”. Nevertheless, Russia was the less incompetent and won this war.

  • Treaty of Stefano (3 March 1878). Russia enjoyed considerable gains. Russia gained territory in Caucasus and regained the southern part of Bessarabia. Ignoring the agreement of Reichstadt Russia helped the creation of Rumania, Serbia, Montenegro and a large Bulgarian state (all open for Russian influence). The diplomatic protests and hostilities forced Russia to a revision of the treaty. Both Austria-Hungary and Great Britain made it clear that it had to be revised. Alexander II and Russia accepted for three main reasons:
    • The war had strained the weak Russian economy
    • Russia had problems defeating the Ottoman Empire. She would not be able to stand up against an alliance of the Great Powers of Europe
    • The pressure from domestic problems and threats of revolt was big
  • Congress of Berlin (June-July 1878). Russia and Tsar Alexander II saw the Congress of Berlin as ”a European coalition against Russia under the leadership of Prince Bismarck”. Russia maintained her gains in Asia but the Balkan settlements were rearranged. The Russians felt that they had won the war but lost the diplomatic negotiations. Both the Balkan nationalists and the Russian Pan-Slavists felt a lingering resentment toward Austria-Hungary, Great Britain and Germany for depriving them of the fruits of the Russian military victory. Russia recovered control of the mouth of the Danube, received areas in Asia which were rich of oil and the creation of Bulgaria was a significant gain of influence. If the treaty would have been compared with the situation in 1876 it would have been a good treaty, but it was not. It was instead compared to the treaty of San Stefano…
  • The Dreikaiserbund was also undermined by the installation of Austrian administration in Bosnia and Herzegovina against the local population’s will.
  • The tension between Germany and Russia escalated even more the next year when Germany introduced protective tariffs against Russian agriculture.
  • Dual Alliance 1879. Germany wanted to make sure that they had an ally so they signed a specific alliance with Austria-Hungary . Russia was now a weak link.
  • Then in 1881 Alexander was assassinated!

Foreign policy of Tsar Alexander III.

Three Emperor’s League 1881. A weakened version of the Dreikaiserbund was established at the beginning of Alexander III’s reign (June 1881). The dual goals of the league were to prevent intervention by Austria-Hungary or Russia in the event of an outbreak of hostilities between France and Germany and to prevent friction between Austria-Hungary and Russia over territorial claims in the Balkans. The Three Emperor’s League was renewed in 1884 but it was not renewed when it expired in 1887. Instead, Russia moved closer diplomatically to France.

France again - the French ”entente”: In 1887 Alexander III refused to renew the Three Emperor’s League (in 1881 the Drekaiserbund changed name). This threatened Bismarck’s diplomatic policies. He managed to receive a bilateral, completely secret agreement with Russia, known as the Reinsurance Treaty 1887.

The refusal of the new German Kaiser Wilhelm II to renew the treaty in 1890 renewed Russia’s international isolation. An agreement to curtail the activities of Russian nihilists in France was followed by the more important step of opening the French money market to Russian borrowing. Slowly, between 1891 and 1894, the military understanding all important to France began to take shape. Meetings between the respective chiefs of staff resulted in an agreement on joint military action. The Tsar finally consented to regard this as the basis of an official Franco-Russian alliance (January 1894). Russia undertook to attack Germany if that country attacked France, or aided Italy in an attack on France. France was similarly committed if Germany attacked Russia, or aided Austria-Hungary in such an attack. This took Europe a step closer to the outbreak of World War I.

THE END!!! We are done with the Higher Level Course. Next time we will revise the Unification of Germany, the Unification of Italy and start with the coming of Mussolini... Please bring your material.

IB3BD Monday 12/4 & IB3BG Thursday 15/4: I handed out three different revision papers; "Bismarck and the German Unification 1862-1890", "Italian Unification 1798-1914" and "Mussolini and Italy". I covered Bismarck and the German Unification. At the end of this paper you could find 15 different Bismarck questions from old exams... We looked at a few of those. Then I covered the first part of the Italian Unification - up to the 1850's. We will cover the rest of this next lesson. Could you please read the text and also read the revision paper about Mussolini and Italy. That is also on our agenda next time...

IB3BD Monday 19/4: We covered the rest of the Italian Unification. This took most of the lesson so Mussolini and Italy was covered fast (NOTE: You have papers at home about Italy after the consolidation of power - you need those papers when you revise - that part is not in the revision paper). You then received a paper with paper 3 - Mussolini questions. A few of those were comparisons between Hitler and Mussolini...
At the very end of the lesson I handed out a Revision Paper about the Spanish Civil War. I also covered that fast. In the end of that paper you can find old Paper 3 exam questions. NOTE - Spanish Civil War is both a Paper 2 and Paper 3 topic so it's worth while to study this revision paper fairly well...
This completed our History Course Higher Level. I have not given you a revision paper about Russia 1855-1894 but you have some good papers I handed out before so just study them and you will know enough (together with Morris of course...). Good Luck with the Exam!!!

IB3BG Friday 23/4: I covered the rest of the Italian Unification. This took most of the lesson so Mussolini and Italy was covered fast (NOTE: You have papers at home about Italy after the consolidation of power - you need those papers when you revise - that part is not in the revision paper). You then received a paper with paper 3 - Mussolini questions. A few of those were comparisons between Hitler and Mussolini...
At the very end of the lesson I handed out a Revision Paper about the Spanish Civil War. In the end of that paper you can find old Paper 3 exam questions. NOTE - Spanish Civil War is both a Paper 2 and Paper 3 topic so it's worth while to study this revision paper fairly well...
This completed our History Course Higher Level. I have not given you a revision paper about Russia 1855-1894 but you have some good papers I handed out before so just study them and you will know enough (together with Morris of course...). Good Luck with the Exam!!!