MODULE – Weimar Republic 1919-1933

TIME PERIOD: 2 lessons (+ expected home work)

TYPE: Individual work (which later will be part of an essay-in-class)

TOPICS: 3 topics 1919-1933

1. The Early Weimar Republic (1919-1923)

2. The Golden Years of the Weimar Republic (1924-1929)

3. The Late Weimar Republic (1929-1933)

PURPOSE: To understand major events and be familiar with the leading characters in Germany during the whole period. It will mostly serve as a background to later events.

MATERIAL:
Old Morris (HL) = 245-253
Newest Morris (SL) = 285-300
Traynor = 171-185

NOTE

  • The new constitution (Note: §48)
  • The Versailles Treaty, reparation bill and the German reaction (Note: “Stab in the back” myth…)
  • The threat from the left; mutinies at the end of the war, the formation of “Soviets” – workers and soldiers councils, Bavarian problems (Kurt Eisner), Spartacist revolt in Berlin
  • The threat from the right; tradition, Frei Corps, Kapp Putsch, assassination of Erzberger and Rathenau, Beer Hall Putsch
  • Economic problems; reparation bill, postponed reparations, Ruhr occupation, hyper inflation (NOTE: the governments economic policies)
  • Foreign Policy before 1924; “the Obstruction Policy”
  • Gustaf Stresemann
  • The solution of the hyperinflation (Hans Luther and Hjalmar Schacht), Rentenmark
  • Dawes Plan, both advantages and problems
  • Economical recovery in the 1920’s – progress
  • Political stability; Stresemann, Hindenburg, the appeased industrialists, military acceptance
  • Foreign Policy of Gustaf Stresemann; “the Fulfillment Policy”, Dawes plan, Locarno Pact, League of Nations, Kellog-Briand Pact, Young Plan…
  • WALL STREET CRASH!!!
  • Young Plan, both advantages and problems
  • Political problems; Stresemann died, Brüning coalition, §48, von Papen (Cabinet of Barons), von Schliecher…
  • Radicalism; KPD, DAP…
IB EXAM QUESTIONS MAY 2003-MAY 2007

Paper 2:

  • Compare and contrast the rise to power of two rulers of single-party states. (November 2003)
  • Analyze the results of two wars, each chosen from a different region. (May 2004)
  • Analyze the methods used and the conditions which helped in the rise to power of one ruler of a single-party state. (May 2005)
  • Peace settlements create conditions for new conflicts. With reference to at least two settlements explain to what extent you agree with this statement. (November 2005)
  • With reference to two examples each chosen from a different region, to what extent do you agree with the claim that ideology was the most important factor in the rise to power of single-party leaders? (November 2005)
  • “It was personality and not circumstances that brought rulers of single-party states to power.” To what extent do you agree with this statement? (November 2006)
  • Analyze the results of either the First World War or the Second World War. (May 2007)
  • Analyze the methods used and the conditions which helped in the rise to power of one ruler of a single-party state. (May 2007)

Paper 3:

  • Analyze the political developments and external relations of either Weimar Germany between 1919 and 1933 or Great Britain between 1918 and 1935. (May 2003)
  • Compare and contrast the economic problems faced by two European countries between 1919 and 1939. (May 2004)
  • Analyze the social and economic changes caused by the First World War, in one European country, up to 1929. (May 2005)
  • Assess the strength and weakness of Weimar Germany between 1919 and 1932. (May 2005)
  • Analyze the main factors which contributed to Hitler’s rise to power in January 1933. (November 2005)
  • Assess the effects of two of the Paris Peace Settlements. (November 2006)
  • Analyze the reasons for the collapse of the Weimar Republic and the establishment of a Nazi dictatorship in the period 1929 to 1934. (November 2006)
  • Why was the Weimar Republic so short-lived? (May 2007)